Primary study · included by 1 review

Comparison of mechanical resistance and standardisation between original brand and replica-like endodontic systems.

Uslu 2023 (ref 35) · Uslu Orkun, Haznedaroglu Faruk, Keskin Cangül · Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc · 2023

Included by

Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of original and replica-like files: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Uslu 2023 · Table 2; Study characteristics; reference list

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Time to fracture (TTF), cyclic fatigue resistance Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files	SMD -1.197 [-1.830, -0.564]	NR	GRADE not reported
Time to fracture (TTF), cyclic fatigue resistance Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files	SMD -0.579 [-3.021, 1.862]	NR	GRADE not reported
Time to fracture (TTF), cyclic fatigue resistance Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files	SMD -0.845 [-1.268, -0.423]	13 studies	GRADE not reported

1 including review in total.