Primary study · included by 1 review
Cemented versus screw-retained zirconia-based single-implant restorations: 5-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Lamperti 2022 · Lamperti Sofia T, Wolleb Karin, Hämmerle Christoph H F, et al. · Clinical oral implants research · 2022
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Bleeding on probing (BoP) Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years | MD 5.18 [-5.92, 16.29] | 5 studies · 178 participants | Very low |
Fracture Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years | RR 0.99 [0.82, 1.19] | 4 studies · 145 participants | Low |
Width of keratinized mucosa (KT) Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years | MD -0.44 [-1.13, 0.26] | 2 studies · 56 participants | Moderate |
Marginal bone level (MBL) Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years | MD -0.04 [-0.08, -0.001] | 8 studies · 298 participants | Moderate |
Marginal bone level (MBL) change Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years | MD -0.04 [-0.08, -0.00] | NR | GRADE not reported |
Modified plaque index (MPLI) Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years | MD 5.01 [-7.05, 17.06] | 2 studies · 57 participants | Moderate |
Marginal bone level (MBL) change Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years | MD -0.04 [-0.08, -0.00] | NR | GRADE not reported |
Probing depth (PD) Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years | MD 0.03 [-0.16, 0.22] | 5 studies · 178 participants | Moderate |
1 including review in total.