evidencegaps
Primary study · included by 1 review

Comparative Analysis of Biodentine, Calcium Hydroxide, and 2% Chlorhexidine with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement as Indirect Pulp Capping Materials in Young Permanent Molars.

Kaul 2021 · Kaul Shalan, Kumar Ajay, Jasrotia Ankush, et al. · The journal of contemporary dental practice · 2021

Included by

A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the success of different protective liners after performing selective caries removal.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2025 · cited as Kaul 2021 · Tables 1-5; References
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Pulp vitality (clinical and radiographic success)
Resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) liner vs Calcium hydroxide liner · 12 months
RR 0.98 [0.92, 1.06]2 studies · 168 participantsModerate
Pulp vitality (clinical and radiographic success)
Biodentine liner vs Calcium hydroxide liner · 12 months
RR 1.05 [0.94, 1.18]2 studies · 86 participantsLow

1 including review in total.