Primary study · included by 1 review

Design, metallurgical features, mechanical performance and canal preparation of six reciprocating instruments.

Martins 2021 (ref 33) · Martins J N R, Silva E J N L, Marques D, et al. · International endodontic journal · 2021

Included by

Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of original and replica-like files: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Martins 2021b · Table 2; Study characteristics; reference list
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Time to fracture (TTF), cyclic fatigue resistance
Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files
SMD -1.197 [-1.830, -0.564]NRGRADE not reported
Time to fracture (TTF), cyclic fatigue resistance
Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files
SMD -0.579 [-3.021, 1.862]NRGRADE not reported
Time to fracture (TTF), cyclic fatigue resistance
Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files
SMD -0.845 [-1.268, -0.423]13 studiesGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.