Primary study · included by 1 review
A Clinical Comparative Evaluation Of The Wear Of Enamel Antagonist To Monolithic Zirconia And Metal-Ceramic Crowns.
Deval 2021 · Deval Prachi, Tembhurne Jyoti, Gangurde Arti, et al. · The International journal of prosthodontics · 2021
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Vertical enamel wear (um), zirconia vs metal-ceramic Monolithic zirconia single-unit crown vs Metal-ceramic (feldspathic veneer) single-unit crown · 12 months | SMD -0.19 [-2.32, 1.93] | 3 studies · 110 participants | GRADE not reported |
Vertical enamel wear (um), overall Metal-ceramic (feldspathic veneer) single-unit crown opposing natural enamel vs Natural enamel opposing natural tooth · 12 months | SMD -2.77 [-5.66, 0.13] | 3 studies · 119 participants | GRADE not reported |
Vertical enamel wear (um), overall Monolithic zirconia single-unit crown opposing natural enamel vs Natural enamel opposing natural tooth · 6 to 24 months | SMD -1.32 [-2.06, -0.57] | 9 studies · 627 participants | GRADE not reported |
1 including review in total.