Primary study · included by 1 review
Comparison of three different types of splints and templates for maxilla repositioning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
Chen 2021 · Chen H, Bi R, Hu Z, et al. · International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2021
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Combined three-dimensional linear deviation (mm), supportive summary Patient-specific implant (PSI) workflows (cutting/drilling guides and/or customized osteosynthesis plates) vs CAD/CAM occlusal splint or wafer workflows · Within 3 days to 1 month postoperative | MD -0.51 [-0.70, -0.33] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Combined three-dimensional linear deviation (mm), supportive summary Patient-specific implant (PSI) workflows (cutting/drilling guides and/or customized osteosynthesis plates) vs CAD/CAM occlusal splint or wafer workflows · Within 3 days to 1 month postoperative | MD -0.46 [-0.66, -0.25] | 9 studies | GRADE not reported |
Combined three-dimensional linear deviation (mm), supportive summary Patient-specific implant (PSI) workflows (cutting/drilling guides and/or customized osteosynthesis plates) vs CAD/CAM occlusal splint or wafer workflows · Within 3 days to 1 month postoperative | MD -0.56 [-0.92, -0.19] | 9 studies | GRADE not reported |
Operative time (minutes), maxillary surgery time only Patient-specific implant (PSI) workflows (cutting/drilling guides and/or customized osteosynthesis plates) vs CAD/CAM occlusal splint or wafer workflows · Intraoperative | MD -22.61 [-64.23, 19.02] | 3 studies | Very low |
1 including review in total.