Primary study · included by 1 review

Mechanical Performance and Metallurgical Features of ProTaper Universal and 6 Replicalike Systems.

Martins 2020 (ref 3) · Martins Jorge N R, Silva Emmanuel J N L, Marques Duarte, et al. · Journal of endodontics · 2020

Included by

Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of original and replica-like files: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Martins 2020a · Table 2; Study characteristics; reference list
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Time to fracture (TTF), cyclic fatigue resistance
Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files
SMD -1.197 [-1.830, -0.564]NRGRADE not reported
Time to fracture (TTF), cyclic fatigue resistance
Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files
SMD -0.579 [-3.021, 1.862]NRGRADE not reported
Time to fracture (TTF), cyclic fatigue resistance
Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files
SMD -0.845 [-1.268, -0.423]13 studiesGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.