Primary study · included by 1 review
The effects of a clinically feasible application of low-level laser therapy on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: A triple-blind, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial.
Mistry 2020 · Mistry Dipika, Dalci Oyku, Papageorgiou Spyridon N, et al. · American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics · 2020
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Cumulative upper canine retraction from baseline (mm) Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) vs Standard orthodontic treatment without the adjunctive intervention · Month 3 | MD 0.46 [0.06, 0.86] | 6 studies · 202 participants | Low |
Cumulative upper canine retraction from baseline (mm) Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) vs Standard orthodontic treatment without the adjunctive intervention · Month 2 | MD 0.72 [0.18, 1.26] | 9 studies · 240 participants | Low |
Cumulative upper canine retraction from baseline (mm) Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) vs Standard orthodontic treatment without the adjunctive intervention · Month 1 | MD 0.31 [0.13, 0.49] | 14 studies · 354 participants | Low |
1 including review in total.