Primary study · included by 1 review
Assessment of Extrusion and Postoperative Pain of a Bioceramic and Resin-Based Root Canal Sealer.
Fonseca 2019 · Fonseca Braúlio, Coelho Marcelo Santos, Bueno Carlos Eduardo da Silveira, et al. · European journal of dentistry · 2019
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Postoperative pain intensity at 24 h Bioceramic (calcium silicate-based) root canal sealer vs Epoxy resin-based root canal sealer (e.g., AH Plus) · 24 h | SMD -0.15 [-0.29, -0.01] | NR | Moderate |
Postoperative pain intensity at 48 h Bioceramic (calcium silicate-based) root canal sealer vs Epoxy resin-based root canal sealer (e.g., AH Plus) · 48 h | SMD -0.29 [-0.42, -0.16] | 4 studies | Moderate |
Analgesic use and flare-up incidence (combined) Bioceramic (calcium silicate-based) root canal sealer vs Epoxy resin-based root canal sealer (e.g., AH Plus) | RR 0.92 [0.76, 1.12] | NR | Low |
Postoperative pain intensity at 48 h Bioceramic (calcium silicate-based) root canal sealer vs Epoxy resin-based root canal sealer (e.g., AH Plus) · 48 h | SMD -0.29 [-0.51, -0.08] | NR | Moderate |
Postoperative pain intensity at 24 h Bioceramic (calcium silicate-based) root canal sealer vs Epoxy resin-based root canal sealer (e.g., AH Plus) · 24 h | SMD -0.15 [-0.28, -0.03] | 5 studies | Moderate |
Analgesic use and flare-up incidence (combined) Bioceramic (calcium silicate-based) root canal sealer vs Epoxy resin-based root canal sealer (e.g., AH Plus) · all reported time points (Figure 6) | RR 0.93 [0.82, 1.04] | 6 studies | Low |
1 including review in total.