Primary study · included by 1 review
Radiographic evaluation and determination of hypercementosis patterns in Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah, Saudi Arabia: A retrospective cross-sectional study.
Elsayed 2019 · Elsayed S A, Ayed Y, Alolayan A B, et al. · Nigerian journal of clinical practice · 2019
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Patient-level prevalence of hypercementosis Radiographic assessment (periapical, panoramic or CBCT) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) | Prevalence (%) 3.45 [1.67, 6.99] | 9 studies | GRADE not reported |
Patient-level prevalence of hypercementosis Radiographic assessment (periapical, panoramic or CBCT) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) | Prevalence (%) 3.76 [3.46, 4.07] | 10 studies · 14881 participants | GRADE not reported |
Patient-level prevalence of hypercementosis Radiographic assessment (periapical, panoramic or CBCT) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) | Prevalence (%) 4.11 [2.11, 7.86] | 9 studies | GRADE not reported |
Patient-level prevalence of hypercementosis Radiographic assessment (periapical, panoramic or CBCT) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) | Prevalence (%) 3.78 [1.87, 7.49] | 9 studies | GRADE not reported |
Patient-level prevalence of hypercementosis Radiographic assessment (periapical, panoramic or CBCT) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) | Prevalence (%) 5.65 [3.56, 8.87] | 9 studies | GRADE not reported |
Patient-level prevalence of hypercementosis Radiographic assessment (periapical, panoramic or CBCT) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) | Prevalence (%) 3.44 [1.61, 7.20] | 9 studies | GRADE not reported |
Patient-level prevalence of hypercementosis Radiographic assessment (periapical, panoramic or CBCT) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) | Prevalence (%) 4.40 [2.28, 8.32] | 9 studies | GRADE not reported |
Patient-level prevalence of hypercementosis Radiographic assessment (periapical, panoramic or CBCT) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) | Prevalence (%) 3.65 [1.80, 7.29] | 9 studies | GRADE not reported |
Patient-level prevalence of hypercementosis Radiographic assessment (periapical, panoramic or CBCT) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) | Prevalence (%) 3.89 [2.04, 7.30] | 10 studies · 14881 participants | Very low |
Patient-level prevalence of hypercementosis Radiographic assessment (periapical, panoramic or CBCT) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) | Prevalence (%) 4.33 [2.23, 8.26] | 9 studies | GRADE not reported |
Patient-level prevalence of hypercementosis Radiographic assessment (periapical, panoramic or CBCT) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) | Prevalence (%) 3.39 [1.53, 7.32] | 9 studies | GRADE not reported |
Patient-level prevalence of hypercementosis Radiographic assessment (periapical, panoramic or CBCT) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence) | Prevalence (%) 3.24 [1.58, 6.52] | 9 studies | GRADE not reported |
1 including review in total.