Primary study · included by 1 review
Comparison of single- and double-puncture arthrocentesis for the treatment of temporomandibular joint disorders: A six-month, prospective study.
Bayramoglu 2019 · Bayramoğlu Zeynep, Tozoğlu Sinan · Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice · 2021
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Maximum mouth opening (MMO) TMJ arthrocentesis, alone or with adjunctive intra-articular agents vs Other therapeutic modalities (conservative therapy, intra-articular injections, arthroscopy, alternative arthrocentesis protocols) · Follow-up from 1 month to 5 years across trials (mean 53 weeks) | SMD -0.67 [-1.14, -0.20] | 14 studies · 549 participants | Low |
Maximum mouth opening (MMO) Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis, alone or with adjunctive intra-articular agents vs Other treatments: conservative therapy (splints, physiotherapy, drugs), intra-articular injections, arthroscopy, or alternative arthrocentesis protocols | Meta-regression coefficient (beta) -0.067 [-0.156, 0.021] | NR | GRADE not reported |
Maximum mouth opening (MMO) Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis, alone or with adjunctive intra-articular agents vs Other treatments: conservative therapy (splints, physiotherapy, drugs), intra-articular injections, arthroscopy, or alternative arthrocentesis protocols | Meta-regression coefficient (beta) -0.681 [-3.831, 2.470] | NR | GRADE not reported |
1 including review in total.