Primary study · included by 1 review

Cemented vs screw-retained zirconia-based single implant reconstructions: A 3-year prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.

Kraus 2019 · Kraus Riccardo D, Epprecht Alyssa, Hämmerle Christoph H F, et al. · Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2019

Included by

Clinical Efficacy of Cemented Versus Screw-Retained Zirconia Single Crowns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Kraus 2019 · Table 1; reference 22
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Fracture
Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years
RR 0.99 [0.82, 1.19]4 studies · 145 participantsLow
Marginal bone level (MBL)
Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years
MD -0.04 [-0.08, -0.001]8 studies · 298 participantsModerate
Marginal bone level (MBL) change
Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years
MD -0.04 [-0.08, -0.00]NRGRADE not reported
Marginal bone level (MBL) change
Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years
MD -0.04 [-0.08, -0.00]NRGRADE not reported
Screw loosening
Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years
RR 0.94 [0.5, 1.77]3 studies · 119 participantsLow

1 including review in total.