Primary study · included by 1 review

Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Cemented Versus Screw-Retained Single Crowns on Customized Zirconia Abutments: 3-Year Results.

Heierle 2019 · Heierle Linda, Wolleb Karin, Hämmerle Christoph Hf, et al. · The International journal of prosthodontics · 2019

Included by

Clinical Efficacy of Cemented Versus Screw-Retained Zirconia Single Crowns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Heierle 2019 · Table 1; reference 21
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Marginal bone level (MBL)
Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years
MD -0.04 [-0.08, -0.001]8 studies · 298 participantsModerate
Marginal bone level (MBL) change
Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years
MD -0.04 [-0.08, -0.00]NRGRADE not reported
Marginal bone level (MBL) change
Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years
MD -0.04 [-0.08, -0.00]NRGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.