Primary study · included by 2 reviews

Resin-modified glass ionomer cement vs composite for orthodontic bonding: A multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Enerbäck 2023 · Benson Philip E, Alexander-Abt Jonathan, Cotter Stephen, et al. · American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics · 2019

Included by

Efficacy of various interventions for the management of white spot lesions associated with fixed orthodontic treatment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Enerbäck 2023 · Table 1

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

Comparison of Bracket Adhesion Failure Rates with Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement Versus Conventional Resin Adhesives: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Benson 2019 · Table 1; Table 2; References 18-24

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Bracket adhesion failure rate (first-time bracket failure) Brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) vs Brackets bonded with conventional resin adhesives (CRA) · 6 to 18 months of follow-up	OR 1.00 [0.60, 1.67]	6 studies · 5563 brackets (2573 RMGIC, 2990 CRA) participants	Low

2 including reviews in total.