Primary study · included by 1 review

Screw-retained monolithic zirconia vs. cemented porcelain-fused-to-metal implant crowns: a prospective randomized clinical trial in split-mouth design.

Weigl 2019 · Weigl Paul, Saarepera Kristina, Hinrikus Kristina, et al. · Clinical oral investigations · 2019

Included by

Clinical Efficacy of Cemented Versus Screw-Retained Zirconia Single Crowns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Weigl 2019 · Table 1; reference 27
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Marginal bone level (MBL)
Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years
MD -0.04 [-0.08, -0.001]8 studies · 298 participantsModerate
Marginal bone level (MBL) change
Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years
MD -0.04 [-0.08, -0.00]NRGRADE not reported
Marginal bone level (MBL) change
Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years
MD -0.04 [-0.08, -0.00]NRGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.