Primary study · included by 1 review
Comparison of Cemented vs Screw-Retained, Customized Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacture Zirconia Abutments for Esthetically Located Single-Tooth Implants: A 10-Year Randomized Prospective Study.
Amorfini 2018 · Amorfini Leonardo, Storelli Stefano, Mosca Daniela, et al. · The International journal of prosthodontics · 2018
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Bleeding on probing (BoP) Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years | MD 5.18 [-5.92, 16.29] | 5 studies · 178 participants | Very low |
Plaque index (PI) Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years | MD 0.01 [-0.13, 0.14] | 3 studies · 121 participants | Low |
Marginal bone level (MBL) Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years | MD -0.04 [-0.08, -0.001] | 8 studies · 298 participants | Moderate |
Marginal bone level (MBL) change Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years | MD -0.04 [-0.08, -0.00] | NR | GRADE not reported |
Marginal bone level (MBL) change Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years | MD -0.04 [-0.08, -0.00] | NR | GRADE not reported |
Probing depth (PD) Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years | MD 0.03 [-0.16, 0.22] | 5 studies · 178 participants | Moderate |
1 including review in total.