Primary study · included by 1 review
A 5-year randomized clinical trial comparing minimally with moderately rough implants in patients with severe periodontitis.
Raes 2018 · Raes Magalie, D'hondt Rutger, Teughels Wim, et al. · Journal of clinical periodontology · 2018
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Implant failure Smoother, minimally rough, machined or hybrid titanium implant surfaces vs Moderately rough or rougher titanium implant surfaces · At least 24 months; longest eligible follow-up | RR 2.12 [0.85, 5.31] | 7 studies | Very low |
Marginal bone-level change Smoother, minimally rough, machined or hybrid titanium implant surfaces vs Moderately rough or rougher titanium implant surfaces · At least 24 months; longest eligible follow-up | MD 0.07 [-0.12, 0.27] | 8 studies | Very low |
Peri-implant probing depth Smoother, minimally rough, machined or hybrid titanium implant surfaces vs Moderately rough or rougher titanium implant surfaces · At least 24 months; longest eligible follow-up | MD -0.36 [-0.93, 0.21] | 4 studies | Very low |
Marginal bone-level change Smoother, minimally rough, machined or hybrid titanium implant surfaces vs Moderately rough or rougher titanium implant surfaces · At least 24 months; longest eligible follow-up | MD -0.06 [-0.29, 0.16] | 5 studies | GRADE not reported |
1 including review in total.