Primary study · included by 1 review

Pioglitazone and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tang 2018 · Tang Huilin, Shi Weilong, Fu Shuangshuang, et al. · Cancer medicine · 2018

Included by

Bladder cancer risk factors: a comprehensive umbrella review of meta-analyses.
Non-Cochrane · aetiology · 2026 · cited as Tang 2018 · Table 1 (Included MA); References
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Risk of bladder cancer
With pioglitazone vs Without pioglitazone
OR 1.17NRGRADE not reported
Risk of bladder cancer
With pioglitazone vs Without pioglitazone
OR 1.13 [1.03, 1.25]20 studies · 4846088 participantsLow
Risk of bladder cancer
With pioglitazone vs Without pioglitazone
OR 1.84 [0.99, 3.42]2 studies · 9114 participantsModerate
Risk of bladder cancer
With pioglitazone vs Without pioglitazone
OR 1.12NRGRADE not reported
Risk of bladder cancer
With pioglitazone vs Without pioglitazone
OR 1.62NRGRADE not reported
Risk of bladder cancer
With angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors vs Without angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors
RR 1.04 [1.00, 1.08]4 studies · 2560819 participantsVery low
Risk of bladder cancer
With pioglitazone vs Without pioglitazone
OR 1.49NRGRADE not reported
Risk of bladder cancer
With pioglitazone vs Without pioglitazone
OR 1.27NRGRADE not reported
Risk of bladder cancer
With pioglitazone vs Without pioglitazone
OR 1.28NRGRADE not reported
Risk of bladder cancer
With pioglitazone vs Without pioglitazone
OR 1.25NRGRADE not reported
Risk of bladder cancer
With pioglitazone vs Without pioglitazone
OR 1.20NRGRADE not reported
Risk of bladder cancer
With pioglitazone vs Without pioglitazone
OR 1.66NRGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.