evidencegaps
Primary study · included by 1 review

Red and processed meat consumption and risk of bladder cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.

Crippa 2018 · Crippa Alessio, Larsson Susanna C, Discacciati Andrea, et al. · European journal of nutrition · 2018

Included by

Bladder cancer risk factors: a comprehensive umbrella review of meta-analyses.
Non-Cochrane · aetiology · 2026 · cited as Crippa 2018 · Table 1 (Included MA); References
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Risk of bladder cancer
Red meat consumption: 100 g per day increment vs Reference level (per-increment dose-response)
RR 1.22 [1.05, 1.41]12 studies · 1062781 participantsVery low
Risk of bladder cancer
Processed meat consumption: 50 g per day increment vs Reference level (per-increment dose-response)
RR 1.20 [1.06, 1.37]10 studies · 575231 participantsVery low

1 including review in total.