Primary study · included by 1 review

Parity and bladder cancer risk: a dose-response meta-analysis.

Bai 2017 · Bai Yunjin, Wang Xiaoming, Yang Yubo, et al. · BMC cancer · 2017

Included by

Bladder cancer risk factors: a comprehensive umbrella review of meta-analyses.
Non-Cochrane · aetiology · 2026 · cited as Bai 2017 · Table 1 (Included MA); References
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Risk of bladder cancer
Ever parity (has given birth) vs Nulliparity (never given birth)
RR 0.79NRGRADE not reported
Risk of bladder cancer
Ever parity (has given birth) vs Nulliparity (never given birth)
RR 0.76 [0.70, 0.82]13 studies · 2699564 participantsLow
Risk of bladder cancer
Ever parity (has given birth) vs Nulliparity (never given birth)
RR 0.82NRGRADE not reported
Risk of bladder cancer
Ever parity (has given birth) vs Nulliparity (never given birth)
RR 0.76NRGRADE not reported
Risk of bladder cancer
Ever parity (has given birth) vs Nulliparity (never given birth)
RR 0.47NRGRADE not reported
Risk of bladder cancer
Higher tooth loss vs Lower tooth loss
RR 1.23 [1.12, 1.35]2 studies · 64095 participantsLow
Risk of bladder cancer
Ever parity (has given birth) vs Nulliparity (never given birth)
RR 0.68NRGRADE not reported
Risk of bladder cancer
Ever parity (has given birth) vs Nulliparity (never given birth)
RR 0.78NRGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.