Primary study · included by 1 review

Efficacy of periimplant mechanical debridement with and without adjunct antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Al Amri 2016 · Al Amri Mohammad D, Kellesarian Sergio Varela, Ahmed Asma, et al. · Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy · 2016

Included by

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2025 · cited as Al Amri 2016 · Figure 3; Table 1

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Marginal bone level change (MBLc), mm Mechanical debridement plus adjunctive antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) vs Mechanical debridement alone · 6-month follow-up	MD 0.29 [0.12, 0.46]	4 studies	GRADE not reported
Bleeding on probing (BOP) change, % Mechanical debridement plus adjunctive antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) vs Mechanical debridement alone · 6 months	MD 5.59 [1.19, 9.86]	5 studies	GRADE not reported
Marginal bone level change (MBLc), mm Mechanical debridement plus adjunctive antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) vs Mechanical debridement alone · 6-month follow-up	MD 0.34 [0.10, 0.57]	4 studies · 253 participants	GRADE not reported
Bleeding on probing (BOP) change, % Mechanical debridement plus adjunctive antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) vs Mechanical debridement alone · 6-month follow-up	MD 5.52 [1.19, 9.86]	5 studies · 313 participants	GRADE not reported

1 including review in total.