Primary study · included by 1 review
Two-Center Prospective, Randomized, Clinical, and Radiographic Study Comparing Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation with or without Bone Graft and Simultaneous Implant Placement.
Markovic 2015 · Marković Aleksa, Mišić Tijana, Calvo-Guirado José Luís, et al. · Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2016
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques) vs None (single-arm incidence) · Intraoperative | Pooled proportion 0.04 [0.02, 0.09] | 13 studies · 2083 participants | GRADE not reported |
Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques) vs None (single-arm incidence) · Intraoperative | Pooled proportion 0.03 [0.02, 0.07] | 13 studies · 2090 participants | GRADE not reported |
Schneiderian membrane perforation Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (any technique) vs None (single-arm incidence) · Intraoperative | Meta-regression coefficient 0.0183 | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques) vs None (single-arm incidence) · Intraoperative | Pooled proportion 0.01 [0, 0.17] | 4 studies · 1472 participants | GRADE not reported |
Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques) vs None (single-arm incidence) · Intraoperative | Pooled proportion 0.05 [0.02, 0.09] | 13 studies · 2102 participants | GRADE not reported |
Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques) vs None (single-arm incidence) · Intraoperative | Pooled proportion 0.05 [0.02, 0.10] | 13 studies · 2059 participants | GRADE not reported |
Schneiderian membrane perforation Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (any technique) vs None (single-arm incidence) · Intraoperative | Pooled proportion (incidence) 0.01 [0, 0.08] | 8 studies · 1322 participants | GRADE not reported |
Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques) vs None (single-arm incidence) · Intraoperative | Pooled proportion 0.04 [0.02, 0.09] | 13 studies · 1886 participants | GRADE not reported |
Schneiderian membrane perforation Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (any technique) vs None (single-arm incidence) · Intraoperative | Pooled proportion (incidence) 0.0109 [0.0019, 0.0597] | 14 studies · 2119 participants | Very low |
Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques) vs None (single-arm incidence) · Intraoperative | Pooled proportion 0.05 [0.02, 0.10] | 13 studies · 1939 participants | GRADE not reported |
Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques) vs None (single-arm incidence) · Intraoperative | Pooled proportion 0.04 [0.02, 0.09] | 13 studies · 1870 participants | GRADE not reported |
Early implant failure (<=12 months) Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (any technique) vs None (single-arm incidence) · <=12 months after implant placement | Pooled proportion (incidence) 0.0115 [0.0022, 0.0575] | 11 studies · 711 participants | Very low |
Schneiderian membrane perforation Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (any technique) vs None (single-arm incidence) · Intraoperative | Meta-regression coefficient -0.0064 | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques) vs None (single-arm incidence) · Intraoperative | Pooled proportion 0.06 [0.03, 0.12] | 13 studies · 1193 participants | GRADE not reported |
Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques) vs None (single-arm incidence) · Intraoperative | Pooled proportion 0.05 [0.02, 0.09] | 13 studies · 2102 participants | GRADE not reported |
Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques) vs None (single-arm incidence) · Intraoperative | Pooled proportion 0.05 [0.02, 0.10] | 13 studies · 2023 participants | GRADE not reported |
Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques) vs None (single-arm incidence) · Intraoperative | Pooled proportion 0.03 [0.02, 0.08] | 13 studies · 1902 participants | GRADE not reported |
Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques) vs None (single-arm incidence) · Intraoperative | Pooled proportion 0.04 [0, 0.24] | 5 studies · 165 participants | GRADE not reported |
Schneiderian membrane perforation Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (any technique) vs None (single-arm incidence) · Intraoperative | Pooled proportion (incidence) 0.01 [0, 0.17] | 6 studies · 797 participants | GRADE not reported |
Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques) vs None (single-arm incidence) · Intraoperative | Pooled proportion 0.04 [0.02, 0.09] | 13 studies · 2105 participants | GRADE not reported |
Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques) vs None (single-arm incidence) · Intraoperative | Pooled proportion 0.05 [0.02, 0.09] | 13 studies · 2100 participants | GRADE not reported |
Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques) vs None (single-arm incidence) · Intraoperative | Pooled proportion 0.04 [0.02, 0.09] | 13 studies · 2093 participants | GRADE not reported |
Schneiderian membrane perforation Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (any technique) vs None (single-arm incidence) · Intraoperative | Pooled proportion (incidence) 0 [0, 0.01] | 4 studies · 233 participants | GRADE not reported |
1 including review in total.