Non-Cochrane · prognostic · PM42240171

Incidence of sinus membrane perforation in transcrestal graftless maxillary sinus augmentation: a meta-analysis.

Huang Zhi-Cheng, Wang Xiao-Ling, Jin Qi-Qi, et al. · Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.2340/aos.v85.46021

Findings

Population Adults undergoing graftless transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation

25 findings

Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques)None (single-arm incidence)Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence
Intraoperative · Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation, clinical studies · Sensitivity analysis: leave-one-out, omitting Brizuela 2014
Pooled proportion 0.04 [0.02, 0.09]
GRADE not reported
13 studies · 2083 participants
Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques)None (single-arm incidence)Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence
Intraoperative · Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation, clinical studies · Sensitivity analysis: leave-one-out, omitting Alzoubi 2024
Pooled proportion 0.03 [0.02, 0.07]
GRADE not reported
13 studies · 2090 participants
Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques)None (single-arm incidence)Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence
Intraoperative · Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation, clinical studies · Sensitivity analysis: leave-one-out, omitting Nedir 2016
Pooled proportion 0.05 [0.02, 0.09]
GRADE not reported
13 studies · 2102 participants
Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques)None (single-arm incidence)Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence
Intraoperative · Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation, clinical studies · Sensitivity analysis: leave-one-out, omitting Zill 2016
Pooled proportion 0.04 [0.02, 0.09]
GRADE not reported
13 studies · 1886 participants
Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques)None (single-arm incidence)Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence
Intraoperative · Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation, clinical studies · Study design: retrospective studies
Pooled proportion 0.01 [0, 0.17]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 1472 participants
Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques)None (single-arm incidence)Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence
Intraoperative · Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation, clinical studies · Sensitivity analysis: leave-one-out, omitting Albadani 2024
Pooled proportion 0.05 [0.02, 0.10]
GRADE not reported
13 studies · 2059 participants
Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (any technique)None (single-arm incidence)Schneiderian membrane perforation
Intraoperative · Dental implant surgery
Pooled proportion (incidence) 0.0109 [0.0019, 0.0597]
Very low
Downgraded: inconsistency, publication bias
14 studies · 2119 participants
Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques)None (single-arm incidence)Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence
Intraoperative · Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation, clinical studies · Sensitivity analysis: leave-one-out, omitting Mazor 2024
Pooled proportion 0.04 [0.02, 0.09]
GRADE not reported
13 studies · 1870 participants
Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (any technique)None (single-arm incidence)Schneiderian membrane perforation
Intraoperative · Dental implant surgery · Follow-up <=12 months
Pooled proportion (incidence) 0.01 [0, 0.08]
GRADE not reported
8 studies · 1322 participants
Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (any technique)None (single-arm incidence)Early implant failure (<=12 months)
<=12 months after implant placement · Dental implant surgery
Pooled proportion (incidence) 0.0115 [0.0022, 0.0575]
Very low
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness, publication bias
11 studies · 711 participants
Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (any technique)None (single-arm incidence)Schneiderian membrane perforation
Intraoperative · Dental implant surgery · Meta-regression: mean residual bone height (univariate)
Meta-regression coefficient -0.0064
GRADE not reported
14 studies
Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques)None (single-arm incidence)Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence
Intraoperative · Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation, clinical studies · Sensitivity analysis: leave-one-out, omitting French 2016
Pooled proportion 0.06 [0.03, 0.12]
GRADE not reported
13 studies · 1193 participants
Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (any technique)None (single-arm incidence)Schneiderian membrane perforation
Intraoperative · Dental implant surgery · Meta-regression: mean residual bone height adjusted for surgical technique
Meta-regression coefficient 0.0183
GRADE not reported
14 studies
Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques)None (single-arm incidence)Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence
Intraoperative · Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation, clinical studies · Sensitivity analysis: leave-one-out, omitting Markovic 2015
Pooled proportion 0.05 [0.02, 0.10]
GRADE not reported
13 studies · 1939 participants
Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques)None (single-arm incidence)Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence
Intraoperative · Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation, clinical studies · Sensitivity analysis: leave-one-out, omitting Nedir 2012
Pooled proportion 0.05 [0.02, 0.09]
GRADE not reported
13 studies · 2102 participants
Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques)None (single-arm incidence)Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence
Intraoperative · Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation, clinical studies · Sensitivity analysis: leave-one-out, omitting Si 2016
Pooled proportion 0.05 [0.02, 0.10]
GRADE not reported
13 studies · 2023 participants
Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques)None (single-arm incidence)Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence
Intraoperative · Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation, clinical studies · Sensitivity analysis: leave-one-out, omitting Rammelsberg 2020
Pooled proportion 0.03 [0.02, 0.08]
GRADE not reported
13 studies · 1902 participants
Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (any technique)None (single-arm incidence)Postoperative complications (acute sinusitis, epistaxis)
Postoperative · Dental implant surgery
Pooled proportion (incidence) 0 [0, 0.01]
Very low
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
14 studies · 2119 participants
Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques)None (single-arm incidence)Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence
Intraoperative · Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation, clinical studies · Study design: prospective studies
Pooled proportion 0.04 [0, 0.24]
GRADE not reported
5 studies · 165 participants
Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (any technique)None (single-arm incidence)Schneiderian membrane perforation
Intraoperative · Dental implant surgery · Follow-up >12 months
Pooled proportion (incidence) 0.01 [0, 0.17]
GRADE not reported
6 studies · 797 participants
Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques)None (single-arm incidence)Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence
Intraoperative · Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation, clinical studies · Sensitivity analysis: leave-one-out, omitting Qian 2020
Pooled proportion 0.05 [0.02, 0.09]
GRADE not reported
13 studies · 2100 participants
Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques)None (single-arm incidence)Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence
Intraoperative · Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation, clinical studies · Sensitivity analysis: leave-one-out, omitting Karaca 2022
Pooled proportion 0.04 [0.02, 0.09]
GRADE not reported
13 studies · 2105 participants
Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (all techniques)None (single-arm incidence)Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence
Intraoperative · Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation, clinical studies · Sensitivity analysis: leave-one-out, omitting Rawat 2019
Pooled proportion 0.04 [0.02, 0.09]
GRADE not reported
13 studies · 2093 participants
Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (any technique)None (single-arm incidence)Schneiderian membrane perforation
Intraoperative · Dental implant surgery · Study design: RCTs
Pooled proportion (incidence) 0 [0, 0.01]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 233 participants
Osteotome sinus floor elevation (OSFE), graftless transcrestalNone (single-arm incidence)Schneiderian membrane perforation incidence
Intraoperative · Graftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation, clinical studies · Surgical technique: conventional OSFE
Pooled proportion 0 [0, 0.04]
GRADE not reported
10 studies · 1564 participants

Included primary studies 25

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Mazor 2024
Maxillary sinus membrane perforation rate utilizing osseodensification-mediated transcrestal sinus floor elevation: A multicenter clinical…
PMID:39187444
20241 other reviewSchneiderian membrane perforationnot extracted yet
Albadani 2024
A graftless maxillary sinus lifting approach with simultaneous dental implant placement: a prospective clinical study
DOI:10.1186/s12903-024-03949-9
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Albadani 2024
A graftless maxillary sinus lifting approach with simultaneous dental implant placement: a prospective clinical study.
PMID:38350895
2024this review onlySchneiderian membrane perforation; Early implant failure (<=12 months)not extracted yet
Alzoubi 2024
Implant Stability After Graftless Motor-Driven Crestal Sinus Elevation: A Cohort Study
DOI:10.1563/aaid-joi-d-24-00015
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Alzoubi 2024
Implant Stability After Graftless Motor-Driven Crestal Sinus Elevation: A Cohort Study.
PMID:38961753
2024this review onlySchneiderian membrane perforation; Early implant failure (<=12 months)not extracted yet
Brizuela 2014
Osteotome sinus floor elevation without grafting material: Results of a 2-year prospective study.
PMID:25674312
2014this review onlySchneiderian membrane perforation; Early implant failure (<=12 months)not extracted yet
French 2016
Survival and Success Rates of Dental Implants Placed Using Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation Without Added Bone Grafting: A Retrospective…
DOI:10.11607/prd.2191
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
French 2016
Survival and Success Rates of Dental Implants Placed Using Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation Without Added Bone Grafting: A Retrospective…
PMID:27031637
2016this review onlySchneiderian membrane perforationnot extracted yet
Karaca 2022
Evaluation of Sinus Membrane Perforation in Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation With and Without Grafting
DOI:10.1563/aaid-joi-d-20-00358
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Karaca 2022
Evaluation of Sinus Membrane Perforation in Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation With and Without Grafting.
PMID:35503963
2022this review onlySchneiderian membrane perforation; Early implant failure (<=12 months)not extracted yet
Markovic 2015
Two‐Center Prospective, Randomized, Clinical, and Radiographic Study Comparing Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation with or without Bone Graft…
DOI:10.1111/cid.12373
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Markovic 2015
Two-Center Prospective, Randomized, Clinical, and Radiographic Study Comparing Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation with or without Bone Graft…
PMID:26315564
2016this review onlySchneiderian membrane perforation; Early implant failure (<=12 months)not extracted yet
Mazor 2024
Maxillary sinus membrane perforation rate utilizing osseodensification‐mediated transcrestal sinus floor elevation: A multicenter clinical…
DOI:10.1111/cid.13368
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Nedir 2012
Osteotome sinus floor elevation with and without grafting material in the severely atrophic maxilla. A 1‐year prospective randomized…
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02569.x
2012this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Nedir 2012
Osteotome sinus floor elevation with and without grafting material in the severely atrophic maxilla. A 1-year prospective randomized…
PMID:22925088
2013this review onlySchneiderian membrane perforation; Early implant failure (<=12 months)not extracted yet
Nedir 2016
Short implants placed with or without grafting into atrophic sinuses: the 5‐year results of a prospective randomized controlled study
DOI:10.1111/clr.12893
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Nedir 2016
Short implants placed with or without grafting into atrophic sinuses: the 5-year results of a prospective randomized controlled study.
PMID:27296955
2017this review onlySchneiderian membrane perforation; Early implant failure (<=12 months)not extracted yet
Qian 2020
Long‐term outcomes of osteotome sinus floor elevation with or without bone grafting: The 10‐year results of a randomized controlled trial
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.13260
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Qian 2020
Long-term outcomes of osteotome sinus floor elevation with or without bone grafting: The 10-year results of a randomized controlled trial.
PMID:31976567
2020this review onlySchneiderian membrane perforation; Early implant failure (<=12 months)not extracted yet
Rammelsberg 2020
Long-term apical bone gain after implant placement combined with internal sinus-floor elevation without graft
DOI:10.1186/s12903-020-01178-4
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rammelsberg 2020
Long-term apical bone gain after implant placement combined with internal sinus-floor elevation without graft.
PMID:32646503
2020this review onlySchneiderian membrane perforation; Early implant failure (<=12 months)not extracted yet
Rawat 2019
Indirect Sinus Floor Elevation Technique with Simultaneous Implant Placement without Using Bone Grafts.
PMID:31293935
2019this review onlySchneiderian membrane perforation; Early implant failure (<=12 months)not extracted yet
Si 2016
Long‐term outcomes of osteotome sinus floor elevation without bone grafts: a clinical retrospective study of 4–9 years
DOI:10.1111/clr.12752
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Si 2016
Long-term outcomes of osteotome sinus floor elevation without bone grafts: a clinical retrospective study of 4-9 years.
PMID:26754021
2016this review onlySchneiderian membrane perforation; Early implant failure (<=12 months)not extracted yet
Zill 2016
Implants inserted with graftless osteotome sinus floor elevation - A 5-year post-loading retrospective study.
PMID:27722225
2016this review onlySchneiderian membrane perforationnot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationAdult patients undergoing graftless transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevationAdults with graftless transcrestal sinus lift; 1370 patients and 2119 sites (n=14)
InterventionGraftless transcrestal sinus floor elevation (OSFE, OD-TSFE, minimally invasive techniques)OSFE (n=10), OD-TSFE (n=1), motor-driven OD (n=1), MISE (n=1), ISFE (n=1)
ComparisonNot restricted; comparative and single-arm studies includedNone (graftless arms only; single-arm incidence)
OutcomesSchneiderian membrane perforation incidence (primary); early implant failure <=12 months; postoperative complications (acute sinusitis, epistaxis)Membrane perforation (n=14); early implant failure <=12 months (n=11); postoperative sinusitis/epistaxis (n=14)
Study designsRCTs, prospective and retrospective cohort studies in English4 RCTs and 10 non-randomised studies (n=14), published 2012 to 2024
TimingNot specifiedFollow-up 0 months to 10 years (median 24 months)

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsNRYesno
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalNRNono
3Choice of study designs explainedNRNono
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalNRNono
5Study selection in duplicateNRYesno
6Data extraction in duplicateNRYesno
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNRNono
8Included studies described in detailNRPartial Yesno
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalNRRCT: Yes · NRSI: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNRNono
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalNRRCT: Yes · NRSI: Yesno
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNRYesno
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalNRYesno
14Heterogeneity explainedNRYesno
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalNRYesno
16Conflicts of interest reportedNRYesno
OverallNRCritically Lowno