Primary study · included by 2 reviews
Caries-preventive effect of sealants produced with altered glass-ionomer materials, after 2 years.
Chen 2012 · Chen X, Du M Q, Fan M W, et al. · Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2012
PubMed 22300651doi:10.1016/j.dental.2012.01.001Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Trial PICO
Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.
Results
Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.
Included by
The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Development of carious lesions on sealed occlusal pits and fissures High-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (HVGIC) fissure sealant placed by press-finger technique vs Resin-based fissure sealant · 48 months | RR 0.62 [0.31, 1.21] | 2 studies · 1007 evaluated sealed teeth participants | Ungraded |
Development of carious lesions on sealed occlusal pits and fissures High-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (HVGIC) fissure sealant placed by press-finger technique vs Resin-based fissure sealant · 60 months | RR 0.29 [0.09, 0.95] | 2 studies · 205 evaluated sealed teeth participants | Ungraded |
Development of carious lesions on sealed occlusal pits and fissures High-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (HVGIC) fissure sealant placed by press-finger technique vs Resin-based fissure sealant · 36 months | RR 0.90 [0.49, 1.67] | 3 studies · 600 evaluated sealed teeth participants | Ungraded |
Development of carious lesions on sealed occlusal pits and fissures High-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (HVGIC) fissure sealant placed by press-finger technique vs Resin-based fissure sealant · 24 months | RR 1.36 [0.66, 2.78] | 4 studies · 1742 evaluated sealed teeth participants | Ungraded |
2 including reviews in total.