Primary study · included by 1 review
Influence of bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success: a retrospective clinical study.
Turkyilmaz and McGlumphy, 2008 · Turkyilmaz Ilser, McGlumphy Edwin A · BMC oral health · 2008
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.48362 [-0.070, 0.809] | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.46 [0.34, 0.57] | 20 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.454 [0.333, 0.560] | 19 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.4760257 [0.201, 0.681] | 2 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.435 [0.307, 0.547] | 19 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.3927642 [0.261, 0.509] | 16 studies | GRADE not reported |
Mean difference in baseline ISQ between surviving and failed implants Baseline ISQ of surviving implants vs Baseline ISQ of failed implants · ISQ at baseline (implant placement) | Leave-one-out mean differences ranged from 4.92 to 15.74, with significance varying by the study omitted | 2 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.3953134 [0.271, 0.505] | 9 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.43 [0.32, 0.54] | 21 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.7551383 [0.614, 0.849] | 2 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.446 [0.318, 0.557] | 19 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.448 [0.322, 0.558] | 19 studies | GRADE not reported |
Mean difference in baseline ISQ between surviving and failed implants Baseline ISQ of surviving implants vs Baseline ISQ of failed implants · ISQ at baseline (implant placement) | MD 10.22 [-2.14, 22.58] | 3 studies · 769 implants participants | Very low |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.433 [0.306, 0.545] | 19 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.435 [0.309, 0.550] | 19 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.431 [0.302, 0.544] | 19 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.403 [0.289, 0.506] | 19 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.422 [0.295, 0.534] | 19 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.423 [0.297, 0.535] | 19 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.450 [0.327, 0.558] | 19 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.436 [0.308, 0.549] | 19 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.44 [0.32, 0.55] | 20 studies · 6160 implants participants | Very low |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.432 [0.303, 0.546] | 19 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.4441092 [0.222, 0.622] | 9 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.427 [0.298, 0.540] | 19 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.456 [0.338, 0.559] | 19 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.437 [0.309, 0.549] | 19 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.445 [0.318, 0.555] | 19 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.407 [0.290, 0.513] | 19 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.5649868 [0.377, 0.708] | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.436 [0.306, 0.550] | 19 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.4488072 [0.236, 0.620] | 9 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pearson correlation (r) between ISQ and insertion torque Implant stability quotient (ISQ, resonance frequency analysis) at implant placement vs Insertion torque (IT) as the correlated measure · ISQ at implant placement (T0) | Pearson r 0.451 [0.329, 0.558] | 19 studies | GRADE not reported |
1 including review in total.