Primary study · included by 3 reviews
Zhou 2023
ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Alveolar bone preservation (ridge height, width, volume or density) Er:YAG laser applied to the extraction socket vs Conventional extraction or surgery without laser (standard care) · 8-12 weeks (interval selected when multiple time points) | MD 1.42 [0.98, 1.86] | 7 studies | Moderate |
Alveolar bone preservation (ridge height, width, volume or density) Er:YAG laser applied to the extraction socket vs Conventional extraction or surgery without laser (standard care) · 8-12 weeks (interval selected when multiple time points) | MD 1.12 [0.9, 1.4] | 7 studies | Moderate |
The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.
The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.
3 including reviews in total.