Primary study · included by 1 review

Tasharoie 2015

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Included by

The Clinical Impact of Dental Implant Placement in Close Proximity to Natural Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2025 · cited as Tasharoie 2015 · References 9-19; Tables 1-2; Figure 2

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Any proximity-related clinical or radiographic complication (composite) Implants placed within 1.5 mm of an adjacent natural tooth or in direct contact with the root surface vs Implants placed at or beyond the recommended 1.5 mm distance · Follow-up 6 to 75 months	Proportion 0.12 [0.05, 0.22]	8 studies · 1898 participants	Low
Implants showing any proximity-related clinical or radiographic alteration Implants placed within 1.5 mm of an adjacent natural tooth or in direct contact with the root surface vs Implants placed at or beyond the recommended 1.5 mm distance · Follow-up 6 to 75 months	Proportion (text-reported) 0.58 [0.55, 0.62]	NR	Low
Any proximity-related clinical or radiographic complication (composite) Implants placed within 1.5 mm of an adjacent natural tooth or in direct contact with the root surface vs Implants placed at or beyond the recommended 1.5 mm distance · Follow-up 6 to 75 months	Effect size (as reported) 0.11 [0.03, 0.22]	NR	Low

1 including review in total.