Primary study · included by 2 reviews

Sherif 2023

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Included by

Comparison of Remineralization Potential of Different Remineralizing Agents on Carious Lesion of Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Sherif 2023 · Table 4; Table 5

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Vickers microhardness Bioactive glass (BAG, including nano-BAG) vs Sodium fluoride (NaF) · After remineralization	SMD 1.00 [0.14, 1.86]	4 studies · 200 participants	GRADE not reported
Vickers microhardness Nanohydroxyapatite (nHA) vs Sodium fluoride (NaF) · After remineralization	SMD 0.01 [-1.13, 1.15]	3 studies · 122 participants	GRADE not reported
Vickers microhardness Nano bioactive glass (nano-BAG) vs Sodium fluoride (NaF) · After remineralization	SMD 1.87 [0.27, 3.46]	2 studies · 102 participants	GRADE not reported

The importance of power in photobiomodulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of high-intensity laser therapy.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Sherif et al. 2023 · Table 1; Table 2 (ref B135)

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Pain intensity (VAS) High-intensity laser therapy, with or without co-interventions vs Placebo, low-level laser therapy, or alternative treatment, with or without co-interventions · End of treatment	SMD -1.22 [-1.58, -0.86]	15 studies · 735 participants	Moderate

2 including reviews in total.