Primary study · included by 1 review

Pattabhi 2024

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Included by

Comparison of intraoperative blood loss in piezoelectric vs. conventional technique surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2025 · cited as Pattabhi 2024 · Table 2; Figure 2; References

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Intraoperative blood loss (mL) Piezosurgery (piezoelectric osteotomy) vs Conventional osteotomy instruments (saws, burs) · Intraoperative	MD -103.21 [-123.61, -82.81]	3 studies	GRADE not reported
Intraoperative blood loss (mL) Piezosurgery (piezoelectric osteotomy) vs Conventional osteotomy instruments (saws, burs) · Intraoperative	MD -82.29 [-99.1, -65.49]	5 studies	GRADE not reported
Intraoperative blood loss (mL) Piezosurgery (piezoelectric osteotomy) vs Conventional osteotomy instruments (saws, burs) · Intraoperative	MD -36.66 [-106.56, 33.24]	1 study	GRADE not reported
Intraoperative blood loss (mL) Piezosurgery (piezoelectric osteotomy) vs Conventional osteotomy instruments (saws, burs) · Intraoperative	MD -84.58 [-107.48, -61.69]	5 studies	GRADE not reported
Intraoperative blood loss (mL) Piezosurgery (piezoelectric osteotomy) vs Conventional osteotomy instruments (saws, burs) · Intraoperative	MD -81.73 [-97.3, -66.16]	6 studies · 144 participants	GRADE not reported
Intraoperative blood loss (mL) Piezosurgery (piezoelectric osteotomy) vs Conventional osteotomy instruments (saws, burs) · Intraoperative	MD -76.4 [-89.58, -63.22]	1 study	GRADE not reported
Intraoperative blood loss (mL) Piezosurgery (piezoelectric osteotomy) vs Conventional osteotomy instruments (saws, burs) · Intraoperative	MD -91.12 [-118.2, -64.04]	3 studies	GRADE not reported
Intraoperative blood loss (mL) Piezosurgery (piezoelectric osteotomy) vs Conventional osteotomy instruments (saws, burs) · Intraoperative	MD -78.0 [-92.43, -63.58]	5 studies	GRADE not reported
Intraoperative blood loss (mL) Piezosurgery (piezoelectric osteotomy) vs Conventional osteotomy instruments (saws, burs) · Intraoperative	MD -84.04 [-100.46, -67.62]	5 studies	GRADE not reported
Intraoperative blood loss (mL) Piezosurgery (piezoelectric osteotomy) vs Conventional osteotomy instruments (saws, burs) · Intraoperative	MD -54.41 [-105.14, -3.67]	2 studies	GRADE not reported
Intraoperative blood loss (mL) Piezosurgery (piezoelectric osteotomy) vs Conventional osteotomy instruments (saws, burs) · Intraoperative	MD -73.39 [-82.98, -63.8]	2 studies	GRADE not reported
Intraoperative blood loss (mL) Piezosurgery (piezoelectric osteotomy) vs Conventional osteotomy instruments (saws, burs) · Intraoperative	MD -74.71 [-83.89, -65.52]	5 studies	GRADE not reported
Intraoperative blood loss (mL) Piezosurgery (piezoelectric osteotomy) vs Conventional osteotomy instruments (saws, burs) · Intraoperative	MD -86.91 [-106.54, -67.29]	5 studies	GRADE not reported

1 including review in total.