Primary study · included by 1 review
Naseh 2011
ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Mean difference CA-DA (years) Demirjian method of dental age (DA) estimation vs Chronological age (CA) | MD -0.44 [-0.61, -0.27] | 11 studies | GRADE not reported |
Mean difference CA-DA (years) Demirjian method of dental age (DA) estimation vs Chronological age (CA) | MD -0.323 [-0.468, -0.178] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Mean difference CA-DA (years) Demirjian method of dental age (DA) estimation vs Chronological age (CA) | MD -0.40 [-0.56, -0.23] | 12 studies | GRADE not reported |
Mean difference CA-DA (years) Demirjian method of dental age (DA) estimation vs Chronological age (CA) | MD -0.33 [-0.46, -0.21] | 11 studies | GRADE not reported |
Mean difference CA minus DA (years) Demirjian's dental age estimation method vs Chronological age | MD -0.52 [-0.66, -0.37] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
Mean difference CA-DA (years) Demirjian method of dental age (DA) estimation vs Chronological age (CA) | MD -0.784 [-1.087, -0.482] | 14 studies | GRADE not reported |
1 including review in total.