Primary study · included by 1 review

Moeintaghavi 2013

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Included by

Low bone density and periodontal disease in postmenopausal women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · aetiology · 2025 · cited as Moeintaghavi 2013 · Table 1; Figures 2-5
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Periodontitis severity: clinical attachment loss (CAL, mm)
Low bone mineral density / osteoporosis (DEXA, WHO T-score < -2.5) (exposure) vs Normal bone mineral density controls
SMD 0.75 [0.22, 1.28]6 studies · 1072 participantsGRADE not reported
Periodontitis severity: clinical attachment loss (CAL, mm)
Low bone mineral density / osteoporosis (DEXA, WHO T-score < -2.5) (exposure) vs Normal bone mineral density controls
SMD 0.92 [0.24, 1.6]4 studies · 932 participantsGRADE not reported
Bone mineral density (BMD)
Low bone mineral density / osteoporosis (DEXA, WHO T-score < -2.5) (exposure) vs Normal bone mineral density controls
SMD -0.64 [-3.01, 1.73]5 studies · 912 participantsGRADE not reported
Periodontitis severity: clinical attachment loss (CAL, mm) (GRADE table, meta-analysis odds ratio)
Low bone mineral density / osteoporosis (DEXA, WHO T-score < -2.5) (exposure) vs Normal bone mineral density controls
OR 2.5217 studies · 3689 participantsLow
Bone mineral density (BMD)
Low bone mineral density / osteoporosis (DEXA, WHO T-score < -2.5) (exposure) vs Normal bone mineral density controls
SMD -0.49 [-3.42, 2.45]3 studies · 772 participantsGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.