Primary study · included by 1 review

Elmancy 2022

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Included by

Comparison of Remineralization Potential of Different Remineralizing Agents on Carious Lesion of Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Elmancy 2022 · Table 4; Table 5

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Vickers microhardness Bioactive glass (Novamin, BAG) vs Sodium fluoride (NaF) · After remineralization	SMD 0.27 [-0.13, 0.67]	2 studies · 98 participants	GRADE not reported
Vickers microhardness Bioactive glass (BAG, including nano-BAG) vs Sodium fluoride (NaF) · After remineralization	SMD 1.00 [0.14, 1.86]	4 studies · 200 participants	GRADE not reported

1 including review in total.