Primary study · included by 1 review

El-Dien Mohamed 2023

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Included by

Comparative Evaluation of Pain Perception Between Needleless Jet Infiltration Anaesthesia and Conventional Needle Anaesthesia for Maxillary Primary Molars in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as El-Dien Mohamed 2023 · Table 2; Figure 4; reference 10

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Pain during injection Needleless jet infiltration anaesthesia (INJEX) vs Conventional needle infiltration anaesthesia · During injection	SMD 0.12 [-0.37, 0.60]	2 studies · 244 participants	Very low
Pain during/after treatment Needleless jet infiltration anaesthesia (INJEX) vs Conventional needle infiltration anaesthesia · During and after treatment	SMD 0.11 [-0.14, 0.36]	2 studies · 244 participants	Low

1 including review in total.