Primary study · included by 1 review

Ates 2019

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Included by

Evidence synthesis of postoperative pain with bioceramic vs. epoxy resin sealers: umbrella review of randomized trials within existing systematic reviews.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2025 · cited as Ates 2019 · Figures 4-6 (forest plot label)

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Postoperative pain intensity at 24 h Bioceramic (calcium silicate-based) root canal sealer vs Epoxy resin-based root canal sealer (e.g., AH Plus) · 24 h	SMD -0.15 [-0.29, -0.01]	NR	Moderate
Postoperative pain intensity at 48 h Bioceramic (calcium silicate-based) root canal sealer vs Epoxy resin-based root canal sealer (e.g., AH Plus) · 48 h	SMD -0.29 [-0.42, -0.16]	4 studies	Moderate
Analgesic use and flare-up incidence (combined) Bioceramic (calcium silicate-based) root canal sealer vs Epoxy resin-based root canal sealer (e.g., AH Plus)	RR 0.92 [0.76, 1.12]	NR	Low
Postoperative pain intensity at 48 h Bioceramic (calcium silicate-based) root canal sealer vs Epoxy resin-based root canal sealer (e.g., AH Plus) · 48 h	SMD -0.29 [-0.51, -0.08]	NR	Moderate
Postoperative pain intensity at 24 h Bioceramic (calcium silicate-based) root canal sealer vs Epoxy resin-based root canal sealer (e.g., AH Plus) · 24 h	SMD -0.15 [-0.28, -0.03]	5 studies	Moderate
Analgesic use and flare-up incidence (combined) Bioceramic (calcium silicate-based) root canal sealer vs Epoxy resin-based root canal sealer (e.g., AH Plus) · all reported time points (Figure 6)	RR 0.93 [0.82, 1.04]	6 studies	Low

1 including review in total.