Primary study · included by 1 review

Abd Elgaleel 2025

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Included by

Digital Versus Conventional Splints in Patients With Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Abd Elgaleel 2025 · Table 2; Figures 3-7; Reference 13

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Maximum mouth opening Digitally fabricated (CAD/CAM) occlusal splint vs Conventionally fabricated occlusal splint · Not specified	MD -0.10 [-0.97, 0.77]	3 studies · 158 participants	GRADE not reported

1 including review in total.