Primary study · included by 1 review
Cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper gold and two replicalike rotary systems. An in vitro study
Alnoury 2024 (ref 30) · Alnoury Arwa · Saudi Endodontic Journal · 2024
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Time to fracture (TTF), cyclic fatigue resistance Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files | SMD -1.197 [-1.830, -0.564] | NR | GRADE not reported |
Number of cycles to fracture (NCF), cyclic fatigue resistance Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files | SMD -1.532 [-3.615, 0.550] | 5 studies | GRADE not reported |
Time to fracture (TTF), cyclic fatigue resistance Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files | SMD -0.579 [-3.021, 1.862] | NR | GRADE not reported |
Number of cycles to fracture (NCF), cyclic fatigue resistance Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files | SMD -1.719 [-4.270, 0.833] | NR | GRADE not reported |
Time to fracture (TTF), cyclic fatigue resistance Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files | SMD -0.845 [-1.268, -0.423] | 13 studies | GRADE not reported |
Number of cycles to fracture (NCF), cyclic fatigue resistance Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files | SMD -1.395 [-4.075, 1.286] | NR | GRADE not reported |
1 including review in total.