Primary study · included by 1 review
Comparison of Acid Versus Laser Etching on the Clinical Performance of a Fissure Sealant: 24-Month Results
Karaman 2013 · Karaman E, Yazici AR, Baseren M, et al. · Operative Dentistry · 2013
doi:10.2341/11-435-cjournal-article
Trial PICO
Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.
Results
Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Sealant retention rate (completely retained) Laser enamel preparation alone (Er,Cr:YSGG or CO2 laser) vs Acid-etching (phosphoric acid) · 18 months | OR 0.82 [0.23, 2.85] | 1 study · 16 participants | Ungraded |
Sealant retention rate (completely retained) Laser enamel preparation alone (Er,Cr:YSGG or CO2 laser) vs Acid-etching (phosphoric acid) · 6 months | OR 1.22 [0.69, 2.16] | 3 studies · 80 participants | Ungraded |
Sealant retention rate (completely retained) Laser enamel preparation alone (Er,Cr:YSGG or CO2 laser) vs Acid-etching (phosphoric acid) · 12 months | OR 1.05 [0.61, 1.80] | 3 studies · 73 participants | Ungraded |
Sealant retention rate (completely retained) Laser enamel preparation alone (Er,Cr:YSGG or CO2 laser) vs Acid-etching (phosphoric acid) · 3 months | OR 2.78 [0.87, 8.91] | 2 studies · 65 participants | Ungraded |
Sealant retention rate (completely retained) Laser enamel preparation alone (Er,Cr:YSGG or CO2 laser) vs Acid-etching (phosphoric acid) · 9 months | OR 1.15 [0.63, 2.10] | 1 study · 43 participants | Ungraded |
Sealant retention rate (completely retained) Laser enamel preparation alone (Er,Cr:YSGG or CO2 laser) vs Acid-etching (phosphoric acid) · 24 months | OR 0.87 [0.31, 2.45] | 1 study · 16 participants | Ungraded |
1 including review in total.