Primary study · included by 1 review
Effects of photobiomodulation with different application parameters on injection pain in children: a randomized clinical trial
Elbay 2023 · Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry · 2023
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Pain perception during local anesthetic injection (needle insertion) Photobiomodulation (low-level laser) before local anesthetic injection vs Placebo (sham) laser · At needle insertion | When only one comparison per study was selected in cases of shared control groups, the pooled estimates remained unchanged | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pain perception (WBFPRS and FLACC combined) Photobiomodulation (low-level laser) before injection vs Placebo (sham laser) · At needle insertion | SMD -0.44 [-0.59, -0.29] | 3 studies · 880 participants | GRADE not reported |
Pain perception during local anesthetic injection (needle insertion) Photobiomodulation (low-level laser) before local anesthetic injection vs Placebo (sham) laser · At needle insertion | Analyses conducted using both the fixed- and random-effects models produced similar results | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pain perception during local anesthetic injection (needle insertion) Photobiomodulation (low-level laser) before local anesthetic injection vs Placebo (sham) laser · At needle insertion | SMD -0.41 [-0.62, -0.20] | 3 studies · 440 participants | GRADE not reported |
Pain perception during local anesthetic injection (needle insertion) Photobiomodulation (low-level laser) before local anesthetic injection vs Placebo (sham) laser · At needle insertion | SMD -0.47 [-0.68, -0.26] | 3 studies · 440 participants | GRADE not reported |
1 including review in total.