Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM41640722

Effect of photobiomodulation on pain perception during local anesthesia in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zanchetta Peron Fernanda, Ribeiro Mauro Cardoso, da Costa Vanessa Polina Pereira, et al. · Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.17245/jdapm.2026.26.1.1

Findings

7 findings

Population
Children and adolescents receiving dental local anesthesiaPhotobiomodulation (low-level laser) before injectionPlacebo (sham laser)Pain perception (WBFPRS and FLACC combined)
At needle insertion · Pediatric dental local anesthesia injection
SMD -0.44 [-0.59, -0.29]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 880 participants
Children and adolescents (5 to 13 years) receiving dental local anesthesia injectionPhotobiomodulation (low-level laser) before local anesthetic injectionPlacebo (sham) laserPain perception during local anesthetic injection (needle insertion)
At needle insertion · Pediatric dental treatment · Sensitivity analysis: one comparison per study when a control group was shared
When only one comparison per study was selected in cases of shared control groups, the pooled estimates remained unchanged
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Children and adolescents (5 to 13 years) receiving dental local anesthesia injectionPhotobiomodulation (low-level laser) before local anesthetic injectionPlacebo (sham) laserPain perception during local anesthetic injection (needle insertion)
At needle insertion · Pediatric dental treatment · Sensitivity analysis: fixed-effect versus random-effects model
Analyses conducted using both the fixed- and random-effects models produced similar results
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Children and adolescents (5 to 13 years) receiving dental local anesthesia injectionPhotobiomodulation (low-level laser) before local anesthetic injectionPlacebo (sham) laserPain perception during local anesthetic injection (needle insertion)
At needle insertion · Pediatric dental treatment · Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC)
SMD -0.41 [-0.62, -0.20]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 440 participants
Children and adolescents (5 to 13 years) receiving dental local anesthesia injectionPhotobiomodulation (low-level laser) before local anesthetic injectionPlacebo (sham) laserPain perception during local anesthetic injection (needle insertion)
At needle insertion · Pediatric dental treatment · Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPRS)
SMD -0.47 [-0.68, -0.26]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 440 participants
Children and adolescents (5 to 13 years) receiving dental local anesthesia injectionPhotobiomodulation (low-level laser) before local anesthetic injectionTopical anesthetic gelPain perception during local anesthetic injection (needle insertion)
At needle insertion · Pediatric dental treatment · Split-mouth studies, Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPRS)
MD -3.3 [-3.98, -2.62]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 55 participants
Children and adolescents receiving dental local anesthesiaPhotobiomodulation (low-level laser) before injectionPlacebo laser, topical anesthetic, pre-cooling or vibrationPain perception
At or after injection · Pediatric dental local anesthesia injection
The overall certainty of the evidence for the outcome pain perception was rated as low
Low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
10 studies

Included primary studies 10

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
AmruthaVarshini 2021
Effectiveness of Pre-cooling the Injection Site, Laser Biostimulation, and Topical Local Anesthetic Gel in Reduction of Local Anesthesia…
PMID:34326589
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Aykanat 2024
Effect of photobiomodulation on the efficacy of anesthesia in maxillary permanent molar teeth with molar incisor hypomineralization: A…
DOI:10.1111/ipd.13118
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Dehgan 2022
Evaluation of the effects of photobiomodulation with different laser application doses on injection pain in children: a randomized…
DOI:10.1007/s10103-022-03674-1
2022this review onlyPain perception during local anesthetic injection (needle insertion)not extracted yet
Elbay 2023
Effects of photobiomodulation with different application parameters on injection pain in children: a randomized clinical trial
DOI:10.22514/jocpd.2023.035
2023this review onlyPain perception during local anesthetic injection (needle insertion)not extracted yet
Hamouda 2024
The use of laser photobiomodulation as pre-anesthetic tissue management technique in reducing injection pain in children
DOI:10.1186/s12903-024-04430-3
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Khan 2023
Low-level Laser Therapy to Alleviate Pain of Local Anesthesia Injection in Children: A Randomized Control Trial.
PMID:38268643
2023this review onlyPain perception during local anesthetic injection (needle insertion)not extracted yet
Seraj 2023
Effect of Photobiomodulation Therapy With an 810-nm Diode Laser on Pain Perception Associated With Dental Injections in Children: A…
PMID:37583496
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Shekarchi 2022
Evaluating the Preemptive Analgesic Effect of Photo‐biomodulation Therapy on Pain Perception During Local Anesthesia Injection in…
DOI:10.1111/php.13605
2022this review onlyPain perception during local anesthetic injection (needle insertion)not extracted yet
Shrutha 2024
Use of Three Pre-Injection Procedures to Reduce Pain Perception of Intraoral Injections in Eight- to 12-Year-Old Children: Randomized…
PMID:39420491
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ucar 2022
Effects of low level laser therapy on injection pain and anesthesia efficacy during local anesthesia in children: A randomized clinical…
DOI:10.1111/ipd.12936
2022this review onlyPain perception during local anesthetic injection (needle insertion)not extracted yet

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationChildren and adolescents undergoing local anesthesia for dental treatmentChildren aged 5-13 years (n=773) in India, Iran, Egypt, Turkey
InterventionPhotobiomodulation/low-level laser therapy before anesthetic procedureDiode laser PBMT 660-980 nm, continuous (n=9) or pulsed (n=1) mode (n=10)
ComparisonNo pre-treatment, placebo laser, topical anesthesia, or other comparative methodsPlacebo laser (n=5); topical anesthetic gel (n=5); pre-cooling, vibration or Buzzy (n=3, within multi-arm trials)
OutcomesPain perception during administration of local anesthesia (reversibility of anesthesia removed by amendment)Pain perception (WBFPRS, FLACC, VAS, MBPS, FPS, SEM); heart rate
Study designsControlled clinical trials in humans10 RCTs (2 split-mouth)
TimingNot specifiedAt needle insertion (pooled)

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesYesno
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalYesYesyes
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesPartial Yesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalNoNoyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallLowLowyes