Primary study · included by 1 review
Cyclic and torsional fatigue resistance of two replicalike and original brand reciprocating system
Lima 2024 (ref 32) · Thaine Oliveira Lima, Marco Antônio Húngaro Duarte, Stefani Jovedi Rosa, et al. · RSBO · 2024
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Time to fracture (TTF), cyclic fatigue resistance Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files | SMD -1.197 [-1.830, -0.564] | NR | GRADE not reported |
Number of cycles to fracture (NCF), cyclic fatigue resistance Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files | SMD -1.532 [-3.615, 0.550] | 5 studies | GRADE not reported |
Time to fracture (TTF), cyclic fatigue resistance Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files | SMD -0.579 [-3.021, 1.862] | NR | GRADE not reported |
Number of cycles to fracture (NCF), cyclic fatigue resistance Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files | SMD -1.719 [-4.270, 0.833] | NR | GRADE not reported |
Time to fracture (TTF), cyclic fatigue resistance Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files | SMD -0.845 [-1.268, -0.423] | 13 studies | GRADE not reported |
Number of cycles to fracture (NCF), cyclic fatigue resistance Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files | SMD -1.395 [-4.075, 1.286] | NR | GRADE not reported |
1 including review in total.