Primary study · included by 1 review
Gingival recession treatment with concentrated growth factor membrane: a comparative clinical trial
Akcan 2020 · AKCAN Serap Karakış, ÜNSAL Berrin · Journal of Applied Oral Science · 2020
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Gingival thickness (GT) CGF with CAF or tunnel technique vs CTG with CAF or tunnel technique · 6 months | MD -0.5 [-0.76, -0.25] | 3 studies · 252 participants | GRADE not reported |
Clinical attachment level (CAL) gain CGF with CAF or tunnel technique vs CTG with CAF or tunnel technique · 6 months | MD -0.38 [-0.58, -0.18] | 2 studies · 182 participants | GRADE not reported |
Mean root coverage (MRC) CGF with CAF or tunnel technique vs CTG with CAF or tunnel technique · 6 months | MD -15.09 [-20.15, -10.02] | 3 studies · 252 participants | GRADE not reported |
Probing pocket depth (PPD) CGF with CAF or tunnel technique vs CTG with CAF or tunnel technique · 6 months | MD 0.07 [-0.03, 0.17] | 3 studies · 252 participants | GRADE not reported |
Keratinized gingival width (KGW) CGF with CAF or tunnel technique vs CTG with CAF or tunnel technique · 6 months | MD -0.89 [-2.53, 0.76] | 3 studies · 252 participants | GRADE not reported |
1 including review in total.