Primary study · included by 1 review
Interproximal open contacts between implant restorations and adjacent natural teeth as a risk‐indicator for peri‐implant disease—A cross‐sectional study
Latimer 2021 · Latimer Jessica M., Gharpure Amit S., Kahng Hahngoo J., et al. · Clinical Oral Implants Research · 2021
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Changes in marginal bone levels (mm) Open proximal contact adjacent to implant restoration vs Closed proximal contact adjacent to implant restoration | MD 0.03 [-0.08, 0.14] | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
Changes in marginal bone levels (mm) Open proximal contact adjacent to implant restoration vs Closed proximal contact adjacent to implant restoration | MD 0.16 [-0.08, 0.39] | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
Changes in marginal bone levels (mm) Open proximal contact adjacent to implant restoration vs Closed proximal contact adjacent to implant restoration · Follow-up 24 to 84 months | MD 0.07 [-0.09, 0.24] | 4 studies · 4697 participants | Very low |
Changes in probing pocket depths (mm) Open proximal contact adjacent to implant restoration vs Closed proximal contact adjacent to implant restoration · Follow-up 24 to 60 months | MD 0.11 [-0.29, 0.51] | 3 studies · 372 participants | Very low |
Changes in marginal bone levels (mm) Open proximal contact adjacent to implant restoration vs Closed proximal contact adjacent to implant restoration | MD 0.04 [-0.15, 0.24] | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
Peri-implant mucositis Open proximal contact adjacent to implant restoration vs Closed proximal contact adjacent to implant restoration · Follow-up 60 months | RR 1.74 [1.06, 2.86] | 1 study · 142 participants | Low |
Changes in marginal bone levels (mm) Open proximal contact adjacent to implant restoration vs Closed proximal contact adjacent to implant restoration | MD 0.15 [-0.18, 0.48] | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
Peri-implantitis Open proximal contact adjacent to implant restoration vs Closed proximal contact adjacent to implant restoration · Follow-up 60 to 84 months | RR 1.63 [0.88, 3.02] | 2 studies · 328 participants | Low |
1 including review in total.