Non-Cochrane · prognostic · PM41587408

Impact of Open Proximal Contacts on Peri-Implant Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Atieh Momen A, Shah Maanas, Hakam Abeer, et al. · Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1002/cre2.70278

Findings

Population Adults (18 years or older) with implant-supported fixed prostheses in function for at least 1 year, adjacent to natural teeth or non-splinted implants

8 findings

Open proximal contact adjacent to implant restorationClosed proximal contact adjacent to implant restorationChanges in marginal bone levels (mm)
University clinics and one private practice; implant level analysis · Leave-one-study-out: Ko et al. (2024) removed
MD 0.16 [-0.08, 0.39]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Open proximal contact adjacent to implant restorationClosed proximal contact adjacent to implant restorationChanges in probing pocket depths (mm)
Follow-up 24 to 60 months · University clinics and one private practice; implant level analysis
MD 0.11 [-0.29, 0.51]
0.11 [-0.29, 0.51] mm
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
3 studies · 372 participants
Open proximal contact adjacent to implant restorationClosed proximal contact adjacent to implant restorationChanges in marginal bone levels (mm)
Follow-up 24 to 84 months · University clinics and one private practice; implant level analysis
MD 0.07 [-0.09, 0.24]
0.07 [-0.09, 0.24] mm
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
4 studies · 4697 participants
Open proximal contact adjacent to implant restorationClosed proximal contact adjacent to implant restorationChanges in marginal bone levels (mm)
University clinics and one private practice; implant level analysis · Leave-one-study-out: Latimer et al. (2021) removed
MD 0.03 [-0.08, 0.14]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Open proximal contact adjacent to implant restorationClosed proximal contact adjacent to implant restorationChanges in marginal bone levels (mm)
University clinics and one private practice; implant level analysis · Leave-one-study-out: Byun et al. (2015) removed
MD 0.04 [-0.15, 0.24]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Open proximal contact adjacent to implant restorationClosed proximal contact adjacent to implant restorationPeri-implant mucositis
Follow-up 60 months · University clinics and one private practice; implant level analysis
RR 1.74 [1.06, 2.86]
182 [15, 458] more per 1000
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
1 study · 142 participants
Open proximal contact adjacent to implant restorationClosed proximal contact adjacent to implant restorationChanges in marginal bone levels (mm)
University clinics and one private practice; implant level analysis · Leave-one-study-out: French et al. (2019) removed
MD 0.15 [-0.18, 0.48]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Open proximal contact adjacent to implant restorationClosed proximal contact adjacent to implant restorationPeri-implantitis
Follow-up 60 to 84 months · University clinics and one private practice; implant level analysis
RR 1.63 [0.88, 3.02]
58 [-11, 186] more per 1000
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
2 studies · 328 participants

Included primary studies 10

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Alhakeem 2023
Risk indicators of long-term outcome of implant therapy in patients with a history of severe periodontitis or no history of periodontitis:…
PMID:35090086
20231 other reviewPeri-implantitisnot extracted yet
Alhakeem 2023
Risk indicators of long‐term outcome of implant therapy in patients with a history of severe periodontitis or no history of periodontitis:…
DOI:10.1111/idh.12587
2022this review onlyPeri-implantitisnot extracted yet
Byun 2015
Analysis of proximal contact loss between implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses and adjacent teeth in relation to influential factors…
DOI:10.1111/clr.12373
2014this review onlyChanges in marginal bone levels (mm); Changes in probing pocket depths (mm)not extracted yet
Byun 2015
Analysis of proximal contact loss between implant-supported fixed dental prostheses and adjacent teeth in relation to influential factors…
PMID:24712313
2015this review onlyChanges in marginal bone levels (mm); Changes in probing pocket depths (mm)not extracted yet
French 2019
Interproximal contact loss in a retrospective cross-sectional study of 4325 implants: Distribution and incidence and the effect on bone…
DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.11.011
2019this review onlyChanges in marginal bone levels (mm)not extracted yet
French 2019
Interproximal contact loss in a retrospective cross-sectional study of 4325 implants: Distribution and incidence and the effect on bone…
PMID:30885585
2019this review onlyChanges in marginal bone levels (mm)not extracted yet
Ko 2024
A two-year prospective study to compare the peri-implant parameters of posterior implant-supported single crowns with and without mesial…
DOI:10.1016/j.jds.2023.11.014
2024this review onlyChanges in marginal bone levels (mm); Changes in probing pocket depths (mm)not extracted yet
Ko 2024
A two-year prospective study to compare the peri-implant parameters of posterior implant-supported single crowns with and without mesial…
PMID:39035261
2024this review onlyChanges in marginal bone levels (mm); Changes in probing pocket depths (mm)not extracted yet
Latimer 2021
Interproximal open contacts between implant restorations and adjacent natural teeth as a risk‐indicator for peri‐implant disease—A…
DOI:10.1111/clr.13730
2021this review onlyChanges in marginal bone levels (mm); Changes in probing pocket depths (mm); Peri-implant mucositis; Peri-implantitisnot extracted yet
Latimer 2021
Interproximal open contacts between implant restorations and adjacent natural teeth as a risk-indicator for peri-implant disease-A…
PMID:33629375
2021this review onlyChanges in marginal bone levels (mm); Changes in probing pocket depths (mm); Peri-implant mucositis; Peri-implantitisnot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationHuman adults aged 18 years or older with implant-supported fixed prosthesesAdults with implant-supported fixed prostheses (4883 implants; 1050 with open proximal contacts)
InterventionOpen proximal contacts between implant-supported fixed prostheses and natural tooth or two adjacent non-splinted implantsOpen proximal contacts (n=1050 implants)
ComparisonClosed proximal contacts in the same situationsClosed proximal contacts
OutcomesChanges in marginal bone level (primary); changes in probing pocket depth; incidence of peri-implant mucositis; incidence of peri-implantitisMarginal bone level change (4 studies); probing pocket depth (3 studies); peri-implant mucositis (1 study); peri-implantitis (2 studies)
Study designsNon-randomized observational studies5 non-randomized studies (cross-sectional, retrospective cohort, case-control)
TimingImplant restorations in function for at least 1 yearFollow-up 24 to 84 months