Primary study · included by 1 review

Comparison of Er,Cr:YSGG Laser Handpieces for Class II Preparation and Microleakage of Silorane- or Methacrylate-Based Composite Restorations

Ergin 2018 · Ergin Esra, Oz Fatma Dilsad, Gurgan Sevil · Photomedicine and Laser Surgery · 2018

doi:10.1089/pho.2018.4459journal-article

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Does Er,Cr:YSGG reduce the microleakage of restorations when used for cavity preparation? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2020 · cited as Ergin 2018 · Table 1; Reference 6

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Incidence of microleakage Traditional bur cavity preparation vs Er,Cr:YSGG laser cavity preparation	RR 1.26 [0.67, 2.38]	6 studies	Ungraded
Incidence of microleakage Traditional bur cavity preparation vs Er,Cr:YSGG laser cavity preparation	RR 1.27 [0.44, 3.67]	5 studies	Ungraded
Incidence of microleakage Traditional bur cavity preparation vs Er,Cr:YSGG laser cavity preparation	RR 1.03 [0.85, 1.25]	11 studies	Ungraded
Incidence of microleakage Traditional bur cavity preparation vs Er,Cr:YSGG laser cavity preparation	RR 0.87 [0.60, 1.27]	6 studies	Ungraded

1 including review in total.