Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42930767

Topical Hyaluronic Acid for Palatal Donor-Site Healing After Autogenous Gingival Graft Harvesting: A Systematic Review and Time-Specific Meta-Analysis with Clinical Implications for Postoperative Care.

Chauca-Bajaña Luis, Lema Gutierrez Hector Alfredo, Zambrano-Manzaba Gabriela Guadalupe, et al. · Journal of personalized medicine · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.3390/jpm16100492

Findings

53 findings

Population
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careWound Healing Index (1–5)
Postoperative day 21
MD 0.53 [0.24, 0.82]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
3 studies · 113 participants
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careComplete epithelialization
Postoperative day 21 · Leave-one-out: excluding Lektemur Alpan 2023
RR 1.74 [1.21, 2.52]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing autogenous gingival graft harvesting from the palateTopical hyaluronic acid (HA as sole active component; gel, mucoadhesive or HA-saturated sponge)Placebo/vehicle, no topical agent, or standard donor-site care (periodontal dressing or sponge)Postoperative bleeding
Postoperative day 1 · Periodontal and peri-implant plastic surgery; palatal donor-site wound · Formulation sensitivity: HA-only plus one multicomponent HA-containing product trial
RR 0.42 [0.14, 1.23]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site carePalatal tissue color match (0–10)
Postoperative day 14 · Leave-one-out: excluding Ceylan Şen 2025
MD 1.85 [1.37, 2.34]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site carePostoperative pain (0–10 VAS)
Postoperative day 7 · Leave-one-out: excluding Ceylan Şen 2025
MD -1.49 [-5.26, 2.27]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careWound Healing Index (1–5)
Postoperative day 7 · Leave-one-out: excluding Nabiyi 2024
MD 0.63 [0.45, 0.8]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careWound Healing Index (1–5)
Postoperative day 7 · Leave-one-out: excluding Ceylan Şen 2025
MD 0.44 [0.05, 0.83]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site carePalatal tissue color match (0–10)
Postoperative day 14 · Leave-one-out: excluding Lektemur Alpan 2023
MD 1.08 [0.26, 1.91]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site carePalatal tissue color match (0–10)
Postoperative day 21 · Leave-one-out: excluding Ceylan Şen 2025
MD 1.69 [0.7, 2.68]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careWound Healing Index (1–5)
Postoperative day 3 · Leave-one-out: excluding Lektemur Alpan 2023
MD 0.37 [0.03, 0.71]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careWound Healing Index (1–5)
Postoperative day 14
MD 0.42 [0.23, 0.6]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 113 participants
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careDaily 500-mg paracetamol tablets
Postoperative day 1
MD -0.6 [-1.73, 0.52]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 74 participants
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careComplete epithelialization
Postoperative day 14 · Leave-one-out: excluding Lektemur Alpan 2023
RR 2.2 [0.97, 4.98]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careComplete epithelialization
Postoperative day 14 · Leave-one-out: excluding Ceylan Şen 2025
RR 2.23 [0.94, 5.29]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site carePostoperative pain (0–10 VAS)
Postoperative day 3 · Leave-one-out: excluding Nabiyi 2024
MD -2.34 [-6.78, 2.1]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site carePalatal tissue color match (0–10)
Postoperative day 21
MD 1.33 [0.43, 2.22]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
3 studies · 110 participants
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careDaily 500-mg paracetamol tablets
Postoperative day 3
MD -0.8 [-1.34, -0.26]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
2 studies · 74 participants
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careComplete epithelialization
Postoperative day 21 · Leave-one-out: excluding Yıldırım 2018
RR 1.73 [1.21, 2.48]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careWound Healing Index (1–5)
Postoperative day 3
MD 0.38 [0.19, 0.56]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 113 participants
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site carePalatal tissue color match (0–10)
Postoperative day 21 · Leave-one-out: excluding Lektemur Alpan 2023
MD 1.41 [-0.14, 2.95]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careWound Healing Index (1–5)
Postoperative day 14 · Leave-one-out: excluding Lektemur Alpan 2023
MD 0.34 [0.05, 0.63]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careWound Healing Index (1–5)
Postoperative day 14 · Leave-one-out: excluding Nabiyi 2024
MD 0.49 [0.28, 0.7]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careComplete epithelialization
Postoperative day 21 · Leave-one-out: excluding Ceylan Şen 2025
RR 1.47 [1.14, 1.9]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site carePalatal tissue color match (0–10)
Postoperative day 14 · Hartung–Knapp sensitivity analysis
MD 1.43 [-0.18, 3.04]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 110 participants
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site carePostoperative pain (0–10 VAS)
Postoperative day 7
MD -0.97 [-3.27, 1.34]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
3 studies · 119 participants
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site carePostoperative pain (0–10 VAS)
Postoperative day 3
MD -1.61 [-4.52, 1.3]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
3 studies · 119 participants
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site carePalatal tissue color match (0–10)
Postoperative day 14 · Leave-one-out: excluding Yıldırım 2018
MD 1.36 [0.18, 2.54]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careComplete epithelialization
Postoperative day 14 · Leave-one-out: excluding Yıldırım 2018
RR 2 [1.04, 3.86]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site carePalatal tissue color match (0–10)
Postoperative day 14
MD 1.43 [0.67, 2.19]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
3 studies · 110 participants
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site carePostoperative bleeding
Postoperative day 1
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
RR 0.72 [0.37, 1.4]
-129 [-289, 184] per 1000 patients
Very low
2 studies · 74 participants
Adults undergoing autogenous gingival graft harvesting from the palateTopical hyaluronic acid (HA as sole active component; gel, mucoadhesive or HA-saturated sponge)Placebo/vehicle, no topical agent, or standard donor-site care (periodontal dressing or sponge)Postoperative bleeding
Postoperative day 3 · Periodontal and peri-implant plastic surgery; palatal donor-site wound · Formulation sensitivity: HA-only plus one multicomponent HA-containing product trial
RR 0.29 [0.07, 1.18]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careWound Healing Index (1–5)
Postoperative day 21 · Leave-one-out: excluding Lektemur Alpan 2023
MD 0.51 [0.02, 0.99]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing autogenous gingival graft harvesting from the palateTopical hyaluronic acid (HA as sole active component; gel, mucoadhesive or HA-saturated sponge)Placebo/vehicle, no topical agent, or standard donor-site care (periodontal dressing or sponge)Postoperative pain (VAS 0 to 10)
Postoperative day 3 · Periodontal and peri-implant plastic surgery; palatal donor-site wound · Formulation sensitivity: HA-only plus one multicomponent HA-containing product trial
MD -1.59 [-3.65, 0.47]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careWound Healing Index (1–5)
Postoperative day 21 · Leave-one-out: excluding Ceylan Şen 2025
MD 0.43 [0.11, 0.75]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careWound Healing Index (1–5)
Postoperative day 3 · Leave-one-out: excluding Nabiyi 2024
MD 0.46 [0.25, 0.66]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site carePostoperative bleeding
Postoperative day 3
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
RR 0.36 [0.07, 1.8]
-104 [-151, 130] per 1000 patients
Very low
2 studies · 74 participants
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careWound Healing Index (1–5)
Postoperative day 21 · Hartung–Knapp sensitivity analysis
MD 0.53 [-0.1, 1.16]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 113 participants
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careWound Healing Index (1–5)
Postoperative day 21 · Leave-one-out: excluding Nabiyi 2024
MD 0.67 [0.47, 0.86]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careWound Healing Index (1–5)
Postoperative day 14 · Leave-one-out: excluding Ceylan Şen 2025
MD 0.36 [-0.0, 0.73]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site carePostoperative pain (0–10 VAS)
Postoperative day 7 · Leave-one-out: excluding Yıldırım 2018
MD 0.1 [-0.38, 0.59]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careWound Healing Index (1–5)
Postoperative day 7 · Leave-one-out: excluding Lektemur Alpan 2023
MD 0.48 [0.05, 0.9]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careWound Healing Index (1–5)
Postoperative day 3 · Hartung–Knapp sensitivity analysis
MD 0.38 [-0.04, 0.79]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 113 participants
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site carePostoperative pain (0–10 VAS)
Postoperative day 3 · Leave-one-out: excluding Yıldırım 2018
MD -0.13 [-0.82, 0.56]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careWound Healing Index (1–5)
Postoperative day 3 · Leave-one-out: excluding Ceylan Şen 2025
MD 0.3 [0.1, 0.51]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site carePalatal tissue color match (0–10)
Postoperative day 21 · Hartung–Knapp sensitivity analysis
MD 1.33 [-0.64, 3.29]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 110 participants
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site carePostoperative pain (0–10 VAS)
Postoperative day 7 · Hartung–Knapp sensitivity analysis
MD -0.97 [-6.11, 4.18]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 119 participants
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site carePostoperative pain (0–10 VAS)
Postoperative day 3 · Leave-one-out: excluding Ceylan Şen 2025
MD -2.39 [-6.74, 1.96]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careComplete epithelialization
Postoperative day 21
RR 1.62 [1.29, 2.03]
354 [166, 429] per 1000 patients
Low
3 studies · 110 participants
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site carePostoperative pain (0–10 VAS)
Postoperative day 3 · Hartung–Knapp sensitivity analysis
MD -1.61 [-8.04, 4.81]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 119 participants
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careComplete epithelialization
Postoperative day 14
RR 2.11 [1.13, 3.94]
227 [27, 600] per 1000 patients
Low
3 studies · 110 participants
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site carePalatal tissue color match (0–10)
Postoperative day 21 · Leave-one-out: excluding Yıldırım 2018
MD 0.9 [0.35, 1.45]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site carePostoperative pain (0–10 VAS)
Postoperative day 7 · Leave-one-out: excluding Nabiyi 2024
MD -1.69 [-5.03, 1.65]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults undergoing palatal autogenous gingival graft harvestingTopical hyaluronic acid as sole active therapeutic componentPlacebo, vehicle, no topical agent or standard donor-site careWound Healing Index (1–5)
Postoperative day 7
MD 0.58 [0.42, 0.75]
Low
3 studies · 113 participants

Included primary studies 8

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Baroudi 2024
Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Palatal Donor Site Healing Using Polyvinylpyrrolidone-Sodium Hyaluronate Gel as a…
PMID:39529394
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bulut 2025
The effect of Polyvinylpyrrolidone-Sodium hyaluronate gel on palatal wound healing: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
PMID:40781616
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ceylan Sen 2025
Comparative evaluation of hyaluronic acid and injectable platelet-rich fibrin in palatal wound healing: a randomized clinical trial.
PMID:41162972
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hassan 2021
Clinical Comparison of MEBO and Hyaluronic Acid Gel in the Management of Pain after Free Gingival Graft Harvesting: A Randomized Clinical…
PMID:34426739
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Khalil 2022
Local application of hyaluronic acid in conjunction with free gingival graft: a randomized clinical trial.
PMID:34623507
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lektemur Alpan 2023
Comparison of hyaluronic acid, hypochlorous acid, and flurbiprofen on postoperative morbidity in palatal donor area: a randomized…
PMID:36595064
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Nabiyi 2024
Effect of Hyaluronic Acid Mucoadhesives on Palatal Wound Healing and Postoperative Discomfort in Free Gingival Graft Surgery: A Clinical…
PMID:39906371
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yildirim 2018
Effect of topically applied hyaluronic acid on pain and palatal epithelial wound healing: An examiner-masked, randomized, controlled…
PMID:28914592
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationAdults (18 years or older) undergoing harvesting of an autogenous gingival or soft-tissue graft from the hard palate for periodontal or peri-implant plastic surgery; standardized palatal wounds eligible but analyzed separatelyAdults undergoing free gingival graft harvesting from the palate (n=8 RCTs; 2 or 3 RCTs and 74 to 119 participants per meta-analysis)
InterventionTopical or locally delivered hyaluronic acid, hyaluronan or sodium hyaluronate (gel, mucoadhesive, impregnated sponge, dressing or other local formulation); multicomponent products only in sensitivity analysesTopical HA: Gengigel 0.2%/0.8% gel, 0.6% high-molecular-weight sodium hyaluronate gel, HA 0.2%/0.8% mucoadhesive, PVP-sodium hyaluronate gel (Gelclair; multicomponent) and 0.8% PVP-sodium hyaluronate saturated gelatin sponge
ComparisonPlacebo, no topical application, spontaneous healing, vehicle or carrier without HA, or standard donor-site care; active comparators only when HA effect could be isolatedPeriodontal dressing alone, no topical agent, vehicle mucoadhesive, saline sponge, sterile gelatin sponge, chlorhexidine alone, Coe-Pak dressing
OutcomesPrimary: postoperative pain; complete wound epithelialization. Secondary: clinical wound-healing scores, wound area reduction, analgesic consumption, burning sensation, tissue color match, postoperative bleeding, patient satisfaction, oral health-related quality of life, adverse eventsComplete epithelialization (days 14, 21; n=3 each); Wound Healing Index (days 3, 7, 14, 21; n=3 each); pain VAS (days 3, 7; n=3 each); analgesic consumption (days 1, 3; n=2 each); postoperative bleeding (days 1, 3; n=2 each); color match (days 14, 21; n=3 each). Wound area, burning, satisfaction, OHRQoL and adverse events not pooled
Study designsParallel-group, split-mouth or crossover RCTsRCTs (n=8)
TimingEach prespecified postoperative assessment analyzed separately (time-specific meta-analyses)Postoperative days 1, 3, 7, 14 and 21

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalYesPartial Yesno
3Choice of study designs explainedNoYesno
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesYesno
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNoNoyes
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesYesno
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoYesno
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalNoYesno
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowLowno