Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42930516

Clinical Evidence of Orally Administered Herbal Preparations for Supportive Cancer Care: A PRISMA Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials (1990-2026).

Moreno-Ponce Rebeca, Díaz-Llerenas Uriel, Hernández-Fuentes Gustavo A, et al. · Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.3390/medsci14060597

Findings

24 findings

Population
Gastrointestinal, breast or lung cancerGamiguibi-tangWait-listSleep quality (ISI)
2 weeks
MD -5.6
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
1 study · 30 participants
Gastrointestinal, breast or lung cancerGamiguibi-tangWait-listFatigue (BFI)
2 weeks
Mean change: −0.8 versus 0.0; p = 0.002; 95% CI NR
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
1 study · 30 participants
Gastrointestinal, breast or lung cancerGamiguibi-tangWait-listAdverse events
2 weeks
Mild dyspepsia was reported following treatment with Gamiguibi-tang.
GRADE not reported
1 study · 30 participants
Lung cancer receiving cisplatin chemotherapyRikkunshitoNo treatment crossoverAnorexia (caloric intake reduction)
14 days
percentage point difference -7
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
1 study · 31 participants
Lung cancer receiving cisplatin chemotherapyRikkunshitoNo treatment crossoverPlasma acylated ghrelin recovery
14 days
Greater recovery by day 5 with Rikkunshito versus control; p = 0.025; 95% CI NR
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
1 study · 31 participants
Lung cancer receiving cisplatin chemotherapyRikkunshitoNo treatment crossoverAdverse events
14 days
No clinically significant adverse events during the intervention period.
GRADE not reported
1 study · 31 participants
Differentiated thyroid cancer receiving radioiodineHoly basil teaControl without placebo teaSalivary gland function
4 days
Better preservation versus control; p < 0.05; numerical effect estimate and 95% CI NR
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
1 study
Differentiated thyroid cancer receiving radioiodineHoly basil teaControl without placebo teaAnxiety (STAI)
4 days
Significant reduction versus control; p < 0.05; numerical effect estimate and 95% CI NR
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
1 study
Differentiated thyroid cancer receiving radioiodineHoly basil teaControl without placebo teaAdverse events
4 days
Persistent nausea was observed in some participants receiving holy basil tea.
GRADE not reported
1 study
Head and neck cancer with radiation-induced xerostomiaAlcea digitata and Malva sylvestris infusionArtificial salivaAdverse events
4 weeks
Mild nausea, gastric discomfort, and polyuria were reported.
GRADE not reported
1 study
Head and neck cancer with radiation-induced xerostomiaAlcea digitata and Malva sylvestris infusionArtificial salivaXerostomia and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-H&N35)
4 weeks
Significant improvement versus artificial saliva; p < 0.05; numerical effect estimate and 95% CI NR
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
1 study
Colorectal cancerAnnona muricata aqueous leaf extractMaltose placeboNutritional status
8 weeks
No statistically significant between-group difference; numerical effect estimate and 95% CI NR
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
1 study · 28 participants
Colorectal cancerAnnona muricata aqueous leaf extractMaltose placeboEx vivo cytotoxic activity
8 weeks
Greater cytotoxic activity in participant serum than with placebo; numerical effect estimate and 95% CI NR
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
1 study · 28 participants
Colorectal cancerAnnona muricata aqueous leaf extractMaltose placeboAdverse events
8 weeks
No clinically significant adverse events during the intervention period.
GRADE not reported
1 study · 28 participants
Prostate cancer receiving pelvic radiotherapyMalva sylvestris and Althaea digitataPlacebo infusionAdverse events
5 weeks
Mild nausea and abdominal distension were reported.
GRADE not reported
1 study
Prostate cancer receiving pelvic radiotherapyMalva sylvestris and Althaea digitataPlacebo infusionAnal burning (VAS)
5 weeks
MD -2.3
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
1 study
Prostate cancer receiving pelvic radiotherapyMalva sylvestris and Althaea digitataPlacebo infusionDiarrhea severity (RTOG grading)
5 weeks
Between-group difference in RTOG grading was not statistically significant; numerical effect estimate and 95% CI NR
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
1 study
Gynecologic cancer with fatigueJing Si herbal teaPlacebo followed by delayed teaQuality of life (FACT-G7)
3-week placebo comparison; 6 weeks total
No statistically significant between-group difference in improvement; numerical effect estimate and 95% CI NR
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
1 study · 19 participants
Gynecologic cancer with fatigueJing Si herbal teaPlacebo followed by delayed teaFatigue (BFI-T)
3-week placebo comparison; 6 weeks total
No statistically significant between-group difference in improvement; numerical effect estimate and 95% CI NR
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
1 study · 19 participants
Cancer survivors with fatigueRenshen Yangrong TangLow-dose huangqiFatigue reduction of at least 2 points
6 weeks
A reduction of ≥2 points was reported in 90.2% versus 52.4% of participants.
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
1 study · 83 participants
Cancer survivors with fatigueRenshen Yangrong TangLow-dose huangqiFatigue (MDASI)
6 weeks
time-by-group interaction estimate -0.61
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
1 study · 83 participants
Cancer survivors with fatigueRenshen Yangrong TangLow-dose huangqiAdverse events
6 weeks
Intervention described as tolerable; comparative or long-term safety profile insufficiently reported.
GRADE not reported
1 study · 83 participants
Cancer survivors with fatigueRenshen Yangrong TangLow-dose huangqiFatigue (MDASI)
4 weeks
Cohen d 1.0
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
1 study · 83 participants
Cancer survivors with fatigueRenshen Yangrong TangLow-dose huangqiFunctioning
6 weeks
Greater short-term improvement in functioning compared with low-dose huangqi control.
GRADE not reported
1 study · 83 participants

Included primary studies 8

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Heydarirad et al., 2017
Efficacy of a traditional Persian medicine preparation for radiation-induced xerostomia: a randomized, open-label, active-controlled trial.
PMID:28494850
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Indrawati et al., 2017
The effect of an Annona muricata leaf extract on nutritional status and cytotoxicity in colorectal cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
PMID:28582808
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lee et al., 2018
Efficacy and Safety of the Traditional Herbal Medicine, Gamiguibi-tang, in Patients With Cancer-Related Sleep Disturbance: A Prospective,…
PMID:29034740
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Li et al., 2025
The effect of Jing Si herbal tea on cancer-related fatigue in gynecologic cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial.
PMID:41189208
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Moeini et al., 2018
The effect of the combination of Malva sylvestris L. and Althaea digitata Boiss. on prevention of acute radiation proctitis in patients…
DOI:10.1016/j.hermed.2018.01.005
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Nomura et al., 2023
Benefits of basil tea for patients with differentiated thyroid cancer during radioiodine therapy: A randomized controlled trial.
PMID:37829808
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Xu et al., 2020
A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial of Renshen Yangrong Tang Herbal Extract Granules for Fatigue Reduction in Cancer Survivors.
PMID:31668965
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yoshiya et al., 2020
Prospective, randomized, cross-over pilot study of the effects of Rikkunshito, a Japanese traditional herbal medicine, on anorexia and…
PMID:31428894
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPatients with a confirmed diagnosis of cancer; no restriction on age, sex, cancer type or stagePatients with gastrointestinal, breast, lung, colorectal, prostate, head and neck, differentiated thyroid and gynecologic cancers, and cancer survivors (n=8 trials)
InterventionOrally administered plant-based preparations originating from infusion, decoction or aqueous-extraction practicesGamiguibi-tang (n=1); Rikkunshito (n=1); holy basil tea (n=1); Alcea digitata-Malva sylvestris infusion (n=1); Annona muricata leaf preparation (n=1); Malva sylvestris-Althaea digitata preparation (n=1); Jing Si herbal tea (n=1); Renshen Yangrong Tang (n=1)
ComparisonNot specified (any comparator in randomized trials)Wait-list control; no-treatment crossover control; control without placebo tea; artificial saliva; maltose placebo capsule; placebo infusion; placebo delayed-treatment; low-dose huangqi active control
OutcomesClinical outcomes related to efficacy, safety, or bothSleep quality, cancer-related fatigue, chemotherapy-induced anorexia, anxiety, salivary-gland function, xerostomia, quality of life, anal burning/diarrhea, nutritional status, ex vivo cytotoxicity, adverse events (each n=1 trial)
Study designsRandomized clinical trials published in English, 1990 to 2026Randomized clinical trials (n=8)
TimingNot specifiedIntervention duration 4 days to 8 weeks

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalYesPartial Yesno
3Choice of study designs explainedNoYesno
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalYesYesyes
8Included studies described in detailYesYesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalNRSI: N/A · RCT: YesRCT: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedYesYesyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalNRSI: N/A · RCT: N/ARCT: N/Ano
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsN/AN/Ayes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalN/AN/Ayes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallHighHighyes