Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42827960

Oral mucositis risk with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapies and combination regimens in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Sun Huiwen, Yao Yifan, Liu Xinyu, et al. · Frontiers in immunology · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2026.1957825

Findings

Population Patients with advanced NSCLC (stage III–IV or recurrent disease)

139 findings

Afatinib + cetuximabChemotherapyGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 13.91 [1.55, 199.26]
Moderate
Downgraded: risk of bias
42 studies · 15903 participants
Afatinib + cetuximabChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Non-exclusively Asian populations
OR 5.44 [0.55, 52.7]
GRADE not reported
37 studies · 14901 participants
Afatinib + cetuximabChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · First-line treatment
OR 12.57 [5.82, 28.18]
GRADE not reported
32 studies · 8668 participants
Afatinib + cetuximabChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 11.97 [2.27, 65.45]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
AfatinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 9.73 [3.75, 26.5]
High
61 studies · 20881 participants
AfatinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · First-line treatment
OR 10.49 [6.29, 18.45]
GRADE not reported
32 studies · 8668 participants
AfatinibChemotherapyGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 8.8 [1.37, 100.11]
Moderate
Downgraded: imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
AfatinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Second-line or later treatment (≥2L)
OR 3.51 [0.22, 56.72]
GRADE not reported
26 studies · 11361 participants
AfatinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Non-exclusively Asian populations
OR 4.44 [1, 19.67]
GRADE not reported
37 studies · 14901 participants
Erlotinib + cabozantinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Non-exclusively Asian populations
OR 5.88 [0.3, 147.75]
GRADE not reported
37 studies · 14901 participants
Erlotinib + cabozantinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 9.64 [0.81, 150.82]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
Erlotinib + cabozantinibChemotherapyGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 0.35 [0.013, 9.2]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
Erlotinib + cabozantinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Second-line or later treatment (≥2L)
OR 3.31 [0.07, 177.12]
GRADE not reported
26 studies · 11361 participants
DacomitinibChemotherapyGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 1.6 [0.39, 7.5]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
DacomitinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Second-line or later treatment (≥2L)
OR 1.98 [0.18, 21.84]
GRADE not reported
26 studies · 11361 participants
DacomitinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 5.12 [1.71, 16]
Moderate
Downgraded: inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
DacomitinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Non-exclusively Asian populations
OR 2.5 [0.51, 12.46]
GRADE not reported
37 studies · 14901 participants
DacomitinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · First-line treatment
OR 7.03 [3.38, 14.88]
GRADE not reported
32 studies · 8668 participants
Afatinib + bevacizumabChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · First-line treatment
OR 5.87 [1.98, 17.78]
GRADE not reported
32 studies · 8668 participants
Afatinib + bevacizumabChemotherapyGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 12 [0.78, 250]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
Afatinib + bevacizumabChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 5.42 [0.6, 50.94]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
Gefitinib + anlotinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 4.43 [0.55, 36.76]
Moderate
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
Gefitinib + anlotinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · First-line treatment
OR 7.16 [2.65, 21.18]
GRADE not reported
32 studies · 8668 participants
Gefitinib + anlotinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Exclusively Asian populations
OR 4.74 [0.77, 27.33]
GRADE not reported
15 studies · 3559 participants
Gefitinib + anlotinibChemotherapyGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 0.75 [0.057, 14]
Low
Downgraded: imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
MobocertinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · First-line treatment
OR 4.18 [2.08, 8.5]
GRADE not reported
32 studies · 8668 participants
MobocertinibChemotherapyGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 8.12 [1.14, 97.77]
Moderate
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
42 studies · 15903 participants
MobocertinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 4.15 [0.63, 27.43]
Low
Downgraded: inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
MobocertinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Non-exclusively Asian populations
OR 4.18 [0.37, 46.22]
GRADE not reported
37 studies · 14901 participants
Afatinib + chemotherapyChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 3.83 [0.37, 52.32]
Low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
Afatinib + chemotherapyChemotherapyGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 8 [0.38, 658]
Low
Downgraded: imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
Afatinib + chemotherapyChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Non-exclusively Asian populations
OR 3.87 [0.24, 78.22]
GRADE not reported
37 studies · 14901 participants
Afatinib + chemotherapyChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Second-line or later treatment (≥2L)
OR 3.86 [0.12, 139.98]
GRADE not reported
26 studies · 11361 participants
Erlotinib + chemotherapyChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · First-line treatment
OR 3.76 [2.05, 7.22]
GRADE not reported
32 studies · 8668 participants
Erlotinib + chemotherapyChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Non-exclusively Asian populations
OR 2.09 [0.63, 7.49]
GRADE not reported
37 studies · 14901 participants
Erlotinib + chemotherapyChemotherapyGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 0.53 [0.13, 2.1]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
Erlotinib + chemotherapyChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Second-line or later treatment (≥2L)
OR 2.89 [0.34, 27.64]
GRADE not reported
26 studies · 11361 participants
Erlotinib + chemotherapyChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 2.84 [1.27, 6.53]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
LazertinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · First-line treatment
OR 4.21 [1.78, 10.34]
GRADE not reported
32 studies · 8668 participants
LazertinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Non-exclusively Asian populations
OR 1.04 [0.06, 18.2]
GRADE not reported
37 studies · 14901 participants
LazertinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 2.6 [0.35, 19.74]
Low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
Erlotinib + bevacizumabChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Exclusively Asian populations
OR 6.15 [0.99, 41.67]
GRADE not reported
15 studies · 3559 participants
Erlotinib + bevacizumabChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · First-line treatment
OR 7.12 [3.03, 18.32]
GRADE not reported
32 studies · 8668 participants
Erlotinib + bevacizumabChemotherapyGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 0.24 [0.048, 1.3]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
Erlotinib + bevacizumabChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 2.44 [0.8, 7.76]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
Erlotinib + bevacizumabChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Non-exclusively Asian populations
OR 1.25 [0.21, 7.86]
GRADE not reported
37 studies · 14901 participants
Erlotinib + bevacizumabChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Second-line or later treatment (≥2L)
OR 0.74 [0.02, 24.23]
GRADE not reported
26 studies · 11361 participants
Gefitinib + chemotherapyChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Non-exclusively Asian populations
OR 3.21 [0.25, 43.02]
GRADE not reported
37 studies · 14901 participants
Gefitinib + chemotherapyChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · First-line treatment
OR 3.18 [1.86, 5.31]
GRADE not reported
32 studies · 8668 participants
Gefitinib + chemotherapyChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Second-line or later treatment (≥2L)
OR 3.2 [0.12, 85.07]
GRADE not reported
26 studies · 11361 participants
Gefitinib + chemotherapyChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Exclusively Asian populations
OR 2.75 [0.81, 8.77]
GRADE not reported
15 studies · 3559 participants
Gefitinib + chemotherapyChemotherapyGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 0.97 [0.25, 3.8]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
Gefitinib + chemotherapyChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 2.2 [0.83, 5.84]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
Osimertinib + bevacizumabChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Second-line or later treatment (≥2L)
OR 2 [0.03, 125.3]
GRADE not reported
26 studies · 11361 participants
Osimertinib + bevacizumabChemotherapyGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 0.044 [0.00054, 1.5]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
Osimertinib + bevacizumabChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Non-exclusively Asian populations
OR 2.26 [0.09, 56.62]
GRADE not reported
37 studies · 14901 participants
Osimertinib + bevacizumabChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 1.88 [0.23, 15.11]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
Erlotinib + sunitinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Non-exclusively Asian populations
OR 1.14 [0.15, 9.37]
GRADE not reported
37 studies · 14901 participants
Erlotinib + sunitinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 1.88 [0.38, 9.6]
Low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
Erlotinib + sunitinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Second-line or later treatment (≥2L)
OR 0.64 [0.04, 10.47]
GRADE not reported
26 studies · 11361 participants
Erlotinib + ramucirumabChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Non-exclusively Asian populations
OR 1.04 [0.08, 14.04]
GRADE not reported
37 studies · 14901 participants
Erlotinib + ramucirumabChemotherapyGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 0.26 [0.037, 1.9]
Low
Downgraded: imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
Erlotinib + ramucirumabChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · First-line treatment
OR 4.82 [1.92, 13.12]
GRADE not reported
32 studies · 8668 participants
Erlotinib + ramucirumabChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 1.75 [0.25, 13.03]
Low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
Osimertinib + chemotherapyChemotherapyGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 0.044 [0.00052, 1.5]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
Osimertinib + chemotherapyChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 1.49 [0.29, 7.69]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
61 studies · 20881 participants
Osimertinib + chemotherapyChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Non-exclusively Asian populations
OR 1.34 [0.16, 11.41]
GRADE not reported
37 studies · 14901 participants
Osimertinib + chemotherapyChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Second-line or later treatment (≥2L)
OR 1.62 [0.11, 25.04]
GRADE not reported
26 studies · 11361 participants
AumolertinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 1.28 [0.17, 9.72]
Low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
AumolertinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Exclusively Asian populations
OR 1.38 [0.24, 7.4]
GRADE not reported
15 studies · 3559 participants
AumolertinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · First-line treatment
OR 2.06 [0.87, 4.97]
GRADE not reported
32 studies · 8668 participants
ErlotinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · First-line treatment
OR 3.95 [1.92, 8.95]
GRADE not reported
32 studies · 8668 participants
ErlotinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Exclusively Asian populations
OR 2.78 [0.66, 12.94]
GRADE not reported
15 studies · 3559 participants
ErlotinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 1.41 [0.72, 2.82]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
ErlotinibChemotherapyGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 0.22 [0.082, 0.65]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
ErlotinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Non-exclusively Asian populations
OR 0.85 [0.32, 2.39]
GRADE not reported
37 studies · 14901 participants
ErlotinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Second-line or later treatment (≥2L)
OR 0.48 [0.1, 2.3]
GRADE not reported
26 studies · 11361 participants
GefitinibChemotherapyGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 0.19 [0.055, 0.61]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
GefitinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · First-line treatment
OR 1.95 [1.34, 2.87]
GRADE not reported
32 studies · 8668 participants
GefitinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Second-line or later treatment (≥2L)
OR 0.56 [0.12, 2.53]
GRADE not reported
26 studies · 11361 participants
GefitinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Non-exclusively Asian populations
OR 0.48 [0.1, 2.2]
GRADE not reported
37 studies · 14901 participants
GefitinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Exclusively Asian populations
OR 1.3 [0.61, 2.54]
GRADE not reported
15 studies · 3559 participants
GefitinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 1.21 [0.64, 2.29]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
61 studies · 20881 participants
Gefitinib + nimotuzumabChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Exclusively Asian populations
OR 1.06 [0.18, 5.92]
GRADE not reported
15 studies · 3559 participants
Gefitinib + nimotuzumabChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Second-line or later treatment (≥2L)
OR 0.46 [0.01, 15.3]
GRADE not reported
26 studies · 11361 participants
Gefitinib + nimotuzumabChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 0.99 [0.13, 7.8]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
OsimertinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Non-exclusively Asian populations
OR 0.93 [0.12, 7.01]
GRADE not reported
37 studies · 14901 participants
OsimertinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Second-line or later treatment (≥2L)
OR 0.81 [0.06, 11.13]
GRADE not reported
26 studies · 11361 participants
OsimertinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 0.87 [0.18, 4.12]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
61 studies · 20881 participants
OsimertinibChemotherapyGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 0.051 [0.00092, 0.88]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
FurmonertinibChemotherapyGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 0.15 [0.0065, 3.7]
Low
Downgraded: imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
FurmonertinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · First-line treatment
OR 1.1 [0.39, 2.95]
GRADE not reported
32 studies · 8668 participants
FurmonertinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Exclusively Asian populations
OR 0.72 [0.11, 4.05]
GRADE not reported
15 studies · 3559 participants
FurmonertinibChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 0.67 [0.08, 5.44]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
PlaceboChemotherapyGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 0.04 [0.0042, 0.24]
Moderate
Downgraded: imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
PlaceboChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Second-line or later treatment (≥2L)
OR 0.1 [0.01, 1.09]
GRADE not reported
26 studies · 11361 participants
PlaceboChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational) · Non-exclusively Asian populations
OR 0.09 [0.01, 0.53]
GRADE not reported
37 studies · 14901 participants
PlaceboChemotherapyAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 0.25 [0.07, 0.94]
Low
Downgraded: inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
AfatinibErlotinibGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 39 [6.3, 434]
High
42 studies · 15903 participants
AfatinibErlotinibAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 6.94 [2.42, 20.04]
High
61 studies · 20881 participants
AfatinibGefitinibGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 46 [6.8, 575]
Moderate
Downgraded: risk of bias
42 studies · 15903 participants
AfatinibGefitinibAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 8.06 [2.95, 22.91]
Moderate
Downgraded: risk of bias
61 studies · 20881 participants
AfatinibOsimertinibAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 11.19 [1.81, 71.61]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
AfatinibOsimertinibGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 191 [5.4, 17406]
Moderate
Downgraded: risk of bias
42 studies · 15903 participants
AfatinibFurmonertinibGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 60 [1.7, 2661]
Moderate
Downgraded: imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
AfatinibFurmonertinibAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 14.52 [1.58, 139.13]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
DacomitinibErlotinibGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 7 [2, 27]
High
42 studies · 15903 participants
DacomitinibErlotinibAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 3.65 [1.26, 10.59]
Moderate
Downgraded: inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
DacomitinibGefitinibGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 8.1 [2.1, 43]
High
42 studies · 15903 participants
DacomitinibGefitinibAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 4.24 [1.4, 13.25]
Low
Downgraded: inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
Erlotinib + cabozantinibErlotinibGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 1.6 [0.07, 34]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
Erlotinib + cabozantinibErlotinibAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 6.83 [0.62, 97.68]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
Erlotinib + chemotherapyErlotinibGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 2.4 [0.59, 9.4]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
Erlotinib + chemotherapyErlotinibAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 2.02 [0.84, 4.79]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
Erlotinib + bevacizumabErlotinibGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 1.1 [0.3, 3.8]
Low
Downgraded: imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
Erlotinib + bevacizumabErlotinibAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 1.74 [0.7, 4.33]
Moderate
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
Erlotinib + sunitinibErlotinibAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 1.34 [0.31, 5.82]
Low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
Erlotinib + ramucirumabErlotinibGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 1.1 [0.21, 6.2]
Moderate
Downgraded: imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
Erlotinib + ramucirumabErlotinibAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 1.25 [0.2, 8.03]
Low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
Gefitinib + anlotinibGefitinibGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 3.9 [0.42, 55]
Low
Downgraded: imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
Gefitinib + anlotinibGefitinibAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 3.67 [0.5, 27.45]
Low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
Gefitinib + chemotherapyGefitinibAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 1.82 [0.72, 4.55]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
Gefitinib + chemotherapyGefitinibGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 5.1 [1.2, 25]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
Gefitinib + nimotuzumabGefitinibAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 0.82 [0.12, 5.81]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
Osimertinib + bevacizumabOsimertinibGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 0.91 [0.11, 6.6]
Low
Downgraded: imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
Osimertinib + bevacizumabOsimertinibAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 2.15 [0.54, 8.7]
Low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
Osimertinib + chemotherapyOsimertinibAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 1.71 [0.48, 6.07]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
61 studies · 20881 participants
Osimertinib + chemotherapyOsimertinibGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 0.89 [0.11, 6.5]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
Afatinib + cetuximabAfatinibAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 1.23 [0.31, 4.8]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
Afatinib + cetuximabAfatinibGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 1.6 [0.5, 5]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
Afatinib + bevacizumabAfatinibAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 0.56 [0.08, 4.07]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
Afatinib + bevacizumabAfatinibGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 1.3 [0.19, 9.2]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
Afatinib + chemotherapyAfatinibGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 0.91 [0.019, 97]
Low
Downgraded: imprecision
42 studies · 15903 participants
Afatinib + chemotherapyAfatinibAny-grade oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 0.39 [0.03, 6.26]
Low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
61 studies · 20881 participants
MobocertinibErlotinibGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 37 [3.7, 533]
Moderate
Downgraded: inconsistency
42 studies · 15903 participants
MobocertinibGefitinibGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 44 [4.3, 673]
High
42 studies · 15903 participants
MobocertinibOsimertinibGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 174 [4.9, 16682]
Moderate
Downgraded: risk of bias
42 studies · 15903 participants
MobocertinibFurmonertinibGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 55 [1.3, 2893]
Moderate
Downgraded: inconsistency
42 studies · 15903 participants
DacomitinibOsimertinibGrade ≥3 oral mucositis
Oncology clinical trials (multinational)
OR 32 [1.3, 2316]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
42 studies · 15903 participants

Included primary studies 64

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
AENEAS, 2022 (Lu et al.)
NCT:03849768
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
ARCHER 1009, 2014 (Ramalingam et al.)
NCT:01360554
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
ARCHER 1050, 2017 (Wu et al.)
NCT:01774721
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
AURA3, 2017 (Mok et al.)
NCT:02151981
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
BeTa, 2011 (Herbst et al.)
NCT:00130728
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
BEVERLY, 2022 (Piccirillo et al.)
NCT:02633189
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
BOOSTER, 2022 (Soo et al.)
NCT:03133546
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Cheng et al., 2016
NCT:01469000
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
COMPEL, 2025 (Peled et al.)
NCT:04765059
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Dittrich et al., 2014
NCT:00447057
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
ECOG-ACRIN 1512, 2017 (Neal et al.)
NCT:01708954
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
ENSURE, 2015 (Wu et al.)
NCT:01342965
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
EXCLAIM-2, 2025 (Jänne et al.)
NCT:04129502
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
FAST-ACT, 2009 (Mok et al.)
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
FASTACT-2, 2013 (Wu et al.)
NCT:00883779
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
FL-ALTER, 2024 (Zhou et al.)
NCT:04028778
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
FLAURA2, 2023 (Planchard et al.)
NCT:04035486
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
FURLONG, 2022 (Shi et al.)
NCT:03787992
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Groen et al., 2013
NCT:00265317
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
IFCT-1503 ACE-Lung, 2021 (Cortot et al.)
NCT:02716311
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
IMPRESS, 2015 (Soria et al.)
NCT:01544179
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
INTEREST, 2008 (Kim et al.)
NCT:00076388
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
IPASS, 2009 (Mok et al.)
NCT:00322452
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
ISEL, 2005 (Thatcher et al.)
NCT:00242801
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
ISTANA, 2010 (Lee et al.)
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
KCSG LU12-01, 2017 (Kim et al.)
NCT:01498562
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kim et al., 2016
NCT:01783834
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
LASER301, 2023 (Cho et al.)
NCT:04248829
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lee et al., 2023
NCT:03126799
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lilenbaum et al., 2008
NCT:00085839
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
LOGIK1604/NEJ032A, TAKUMI, 2021 (Tanaka et al.)
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
LUX-Lung 5, 2016 (Schuler et al.)
NCT:01085136
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
LUX-Lung 6, 2014 (Wu et al.)
NCT:01121393
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
LUX-Lung 7, 2017 (Paz-Ares et al.)
NCT:01466660
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
LUX-Lung 8, 2015 (Soria et al.)
NCT:01523587
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
LUX‑Lung 1, 2012 (Mille et al.)
NCT:00656136
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
LUX‑Lung 3, 2023 (Sequist et al.)
NCT:00949650
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
NCIC CTG BR.26, 2014 (Ellis et al.)
NCT:01000025
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
NEJ002, 2010 (Maemondo et al.)
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
NEJ002, 2010 (Maemondo et al.)
PMID:0022010
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
NEJ009, 2020 (Hosomi et al.)
PMID:0092020
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
NEJ026, 2019 (Saito et al.)
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
NEJ026, 2019 (Saito et al.)
PMID:0262019
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ninomiya et al., 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
OPTIMAL,CTONG-0802, 2011 (Zhou et al.)
NCT:00874419
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
PDX‑012, 2012 (Kelly et al.)
NCT:00606502
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ramalingam et al., 2012
NCT:00769067
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Registry study, 2009
NCT:00294762
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Registry study, 2010
NCT:01196078
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Registry study, 2011
NCT:01998919
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Registry study, 2015
NCT:01652469
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Registry study, 2017
NCT:00126581
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
RELAY, 2019 (Nakagawa et al.)
NCT:02411448
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
S103, 2013 (Lee et al.)
NCT:00550173
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Stinchcomb et al., 2019
NCT:01532089
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
SUN1087, 2012 (Scagliotti et al.)
NCT:00457392
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
SWOG S1403, 2020 (Goldberg et al.)
NCT:02438722
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
TITAN, 2012 (Ciuleanu et al.)
NCT:00556322
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
TOPICAL, 2012 (Lee et al.)
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
V-15-32, 2008 (Maruyama et al.)
NCT:00252707
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
WJOG9717L, 2022 (Kenmots et al.)
PMID:97172022
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
WJTOG3405, 2010 (Mitsudomi et al.)
Breast ductal carcinoma in situ with micro-invasion versus ductal carcinoma in situ: a comparative analysis of clinicopathological and…
PMID:34052010
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yang et al., 2014
NCT:01017874
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yu et al., 2014
NCT:01769066
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPatients with pathologically or cytologically confirmed advanced NSCLC (stage III–IV or recurrent disease)63 RCTs, 21,845 randomized participants with advanced, metastatic or recurrent NSCLC (36 first-line, 26 second-line or later, 1 not specified; 26 exclusively Asian) (n=63)
InterventionEGFR-TKI monotherapy (gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, dacomitinib, osimertinib, furmonertinib, aumolertinib, lazertinib, mobocertinib), including with matched placebo; EGFR-TKI-based combinations with chemotherapy, antiangiogenic agents, EGFR-directed antibodies or other targeted agents9 EGFR-TKI monotherapies and 13 EGFR-TKI-based combinations (24 network nodes including chemotherapy and placebo) (n=63)
ComparisonPlacebo; chemotherapy with or without placebo (all regimens pooled into one node); EGFR-TKI monotherapy; another eligible EGFR-TKI-based regimenChemotherapy (network reference), placebo and other EGFR-TKI regimens (n=63)
OutcomesPrimary: any-grade oral mucositis (OM, including stomatitis); secondary: grade ≥3 OMAny-grade OM (n=61 RCTs, 20,881 participants, 24 nodes); grade ≥3 OM reported in 50 RCTs, NMA of 42 RCTs, 15,903 participants, 20 nodes after excluding 8 double-zero trials (lazertinib, aumolertinib, erlotinib + sunitinib and gefitinib + nimotuzumab absent from the grade ≥3 network)
Study designsPhase II or III RCTs with ≥30 randomized participantsRCTs: 25 phase II, 37 phase III, 1 phase II/III (n=63)
TimingNot specifiedNot specified

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesYesno
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNoNoyes
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesYesno
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoYesno
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalNoNoyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowCritically Lowyes