Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42796255

Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy for Functional Sequelae in Adults with Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Linero-Bocanegra Miriam, Fernández-Morales Carlos, Torres-Lagares Daniel, et al. · Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.3390/medicina62091648

Findings

Population Adults with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy

8 findings

Preventive jaw rehabilitationUsual careTrismus (maximum mouth opening ≤35 mm)
12 months after radiotherapy · Modified Hartung–Knapp sensitivity analysis
RR 0.87 [0.25, 2.98]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 205 participants
Preventive jaw rehabilitationUsual careMouth opening
12 months after radiotherapy · Sensitivity: other Bragante intervention arm
MD 2.81 [0.06, 5.56]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Preventive jaw rehabilitationUsual careTrismus (maximum mouth opening ≤35 mm)
12 months after radiotherapy · Primary analysis; combined active arms
RR 0.87 [0.53, 1.42]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 205 participants
Preventive jaw rehabilitationUsual careMouth opening
12 months after radiotherapy · Primary analysis; combined active arms
MD 2.85 [0.38, 5.32]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 212 participants
Preventive jaw rehabilitationUsual careMouth opening
12 months after radiotherapy · Sensitivity: one Bragante intervention arm
MD 3.03 [0.58, 5.48]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Preventive jaw rehabilitationUsual careTrismus (maximum mouth opening ≤35 mm)
12 months after radiotherapy · Sensitivity: Saghafi 6-month assessment
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
no estimate extracted
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Preventive jaw rehabilitationUsual careMouth opening
12 months after radiotherapy · Endpoint-only sensitivity analysis
MD 2.50 [-0.51, 5.51]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Preventive jaw rehabilitationUsual careMouth opening
12 months after radiotherapy · Modified Hartung–Knapp sensitivity analysis
MD 2.85 [-2.58, 8.27]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 212 participants

Included primary studies 27

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Baudelet 2024
Prophylactic Swallowing Therapy During Head-and-Neck Cancer Radiotherapy: Effect of Service-Delivery Mode and Overall Adherence Level on…
PMID:37550571
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bragante 2020
Efficacy of exercise therapy during radiotherapy to prevent reduction in mouth opening in patients with head and neck cancer: A randomized…
PMID:31685429
2020this review onlyMouth opening; Trismus (maximum mouth opening ≤35 mm)not extracted yet
Carnaby-Mann 2012
"Pharyngocise": randomized controlled trial of preventative exercises to maintain muscle structure and swallowing function during…
PMID:22014959
2012this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Govender 2020
SIP SMART: a parallel group randomised feasibility trial of a tailored pre-treatment swallowing intervention package compared with usual…
PMID:32349693
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hogdal 2015
Early preventive exercises versus usual care does not seem to reduce trismus in patients treated with radiotherapy for cancer in the oral…
PMID:25229260
2015this review onlyMouth opening; Trismus (maximum mouth opening ≤35 mm)not extracted yet
Karlsson 2015
Effects of voice rehabilitation on health-related quality of life, communication and voice in laryngeal cancer patients treated with…
PMID:25615892
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Karlsson 2024
Do Effects of Voice Rehabilitation in Patients Irradiated for Laryngeal Cancer Remain 5 Years Postradiotherapy?
PMID:38688777
2026this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Krisciunas 2017
Impact of Compliance on Dysphagia Rehabilitation in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: Results from a Multi-center Clinical Trial.
PMID:27848021
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lazarus 2014
Effects of exercise on swallowing and tongue strength in patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer treated with primary radiotherapy…
PMID:24332586
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Li 2025
The Effectiveness of an Esophageal Speech Rehabilitation Program for Total Laryngectomy Patients Based on Behavior Change Wheel Theory: A…
PMID:40234121
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Loorents 2014
Prophylactic training for the prevention of radiotherapy-induced trismus - a randomised study.
PMID:24635110
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Messing 2017
Prophylactic Swallow Therapy for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy: A Randomized Trial.
PMID:28444488
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Millgard 2020
Voice Quality in Laryngeal Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study of the Effect of Voice Rehabilitation.
PMID:32389236
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Petersson 2023
A randomized controlled study evaluating the head-lift exercise in head and neck cancer patients with radiation-induced dysphagia: effect…
PMID:37584752
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Saghafi 2026
Jaw exercise in head and neck cancer patients for prevention of temporomandibular disorders: a randomized controlled trial.
PMID:39576571
2026this review onlyMouth opening; Trismus (maximum mouth opening ≤35 mm)not extracted yet
Schipor-Diaconu 2024
Prophylactic Swallowing Exercises in Patients with Laryngeal Cancer Who Underwent Total Laryngectomy-A Randomized Trial.
PMID:39590137
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Shanmugam 2024
Impact of Prehabilitation With Preoperative Swallowing Exercises on Postoperative Swallowing Morbidity in Oral Cavity Cancer: Randomized…
PMID:39376764
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Tuomi 2014
Effects of voice rehabilitation after radiation therapy for laryngeal cancer: a randomized controlled study.
PMID:25035200
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Tuomi 2017
Voice Range Profile and Health-related Quality of Life Measurements Following Voice Rehabilitation After Radiotherapy; a Randomized…
PMID:27091469
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Tuomi 2022
The effect of the Shaker head-lift exercise on swallowing function following treatment for head and neck cancer: Results from a…
PMID:35068016
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
van der Geer 2020
The use of stretching devices for treatment of trismus in head and neck cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial.
PMID:31701267
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wang 2019
Effects of a mouth-opening intervention with remote support on adherence, the maximum interincisal opening, and mandibular function of…
PMID:31229200
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wu 2024
Early swallowing training after free flap surgery in oral cancer: A randomized controlled trial.
PMID:37392422
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yang 2025
The impact of different timing of mouth opening exercises on trismus in postoperative radiotherapy patients with oral cancer.
PMID:39366485
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zhang 2022
Effects of personalized swallowing rehabilitation in patients with oral cancer after free flap transplantation: A cluster randomized…
PMID:36126603
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zhang 2024
Effects of personalized oral exercises on swallowing function among patients with oral cancer after free flap transplantation: a cluster…
PMID:38143220
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zhang Y 2025
Normalcy of Swallowing in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Particle Therapy Supported by Combined Swallowing Training and Feeding…
PMID:40013496
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationAdults (18 years or older) with primary head and neck cancer treated with surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, immunotherapy or combinations, with at least one functional, musculoskeletal or participation-related sequelaAdults with head and neck cancer during or after radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy, after oral-cancer surgery with free-flap reconstruction, after total laryngectomy, before treatment, or as survivors with established dysphagia or trismus (n=21 trials)
InterventionConservative rehabilitation or physiotherapy: therapeutic exercise, manual therapy, electrotherapy, functional training, orofacial rehabilitation, cervical and shoulder rehabilitation, swallowing exercises, supervised home-based programs, telerehabilitation, rehabilitation devices within a conservative programPreventive jaw rehabilitation (n=3 pooled), postoperative swallowing rehabilitation (n=2), early mouth-opening exercises, telephone-supported mouth-opening program, enhanced or prophylactic swallowing programs, prehabilitation, voice and esophageal speech rehabilitation, NMES, delivery-mode variants, stretching devices
ComparisonUsual care, standard education or instructions, no intervention, waiting list, placebo or sham, other active interventions, different rehabilitation modalities, intensities, frequencies or dosesUsual or routine care, delayed start of the same program, same program without support, basic rehabilitation, sham NMES, alternative delivery modes, alternative device
OutcomesValidated functional outcomes: mouth opening, mandibular function, swallowing function, cervical mobility, shoulder function, voice, fatigue, lymphedema, health-related quality of lifeMouth opening (meta-analysis, n=3); trismus (meta-analysis, n=3); MASA-OC postoperative swallowing (n=2, not pooled); other swallowing, swallowing-related quality of life, voice and communication outcomes (individual estimates or narrative)
Study designsRandomized controlled trials (individually or cluster randomized)21 randomized trials (27 reports), including 2 cluster-randomized trials (n=21)
TimingNot specified (longest common follow-up within the same clinically relevant period)12 months after radiotherapy for mouth opening and trismus; 1 month after surgery for MASA-OC

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoYesno
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesYesno
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNoNoyes
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesYesno
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoYesno
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalNoNoyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowCritically Lowyes