Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42423860

Hangeshashinto for the prevention of oral mucositis in patients receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ishizuka Mitsuru, Shibuya Norisuke, Hachiya Hiroyuki, et al. · Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1007/s00520-026-10975-6

Findings

Population Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy (gastric, colorectal, esophageal, head and neck; Japan)

3 findings

Hangeshashinto (TJ-14) during chemotherapyNo hangeshashinto or placeboChemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (grade 2 or higher by CTCAE v5.0, described as more than grade 1)
Overall (all 6 studies)
RR 0.86 [0.73, 1.00]
78/152 (51.3%) vs 65/141 (46.1%)
Moderate
6 studies · 293 participants
Hangeshashinto (TJ-14) during chemotherapyNo hangeshashinto or placeboChemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (grade 2 or higher by CTCAE v5.0, described as more than grade 1)
Sensitivity analysis excluding the 2 radiotherapy studies
RR 0.90 [0.67, 1.21]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Hangeshashinto (TJ-14) during chemotherapyNo hangeshashinto or placeboChemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (grade 2 or higher by CTCAE v5.0, described as more than grade 1)
Other meta-analysis of the 2 placebo-controlled gastric and colorectal RCTs (Aoyama 2014, Matsuda 2015)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
RR 0.81 [0.56, 1.17]
GRADE not reported
2 studies

Included primary studies 10

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Aoyama 2014
Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II study of TJ-14 (hangeshashinto) for gastric cancer chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis
DOI:10.1007/s00280-014-2440-x
2014this review onlyChemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (grade 2 or higher by CTCAE v5.0, described as more than grade 1)not extracted yet
Aoyama 2014
Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II study of TJ-14 (hangeshashinto) for gastric cancer chemotherapy-induced oral…
PMID:24652604
2014this review onlyChemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (grade 2 or higher by CTCAE v5.0, described as more than grade 1)not extracted yet
Kato 2023
Efficacy of Cryotherapy and Hangeshashinto for Radiation-induced Oral Stomatitis: Preliminary Study
DOI:10.21873/invivo.13149
2023this review onlyChemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (grade 2 or higher by CTCAE v5.0, described as more than grade 1)not extracted yet
Kato 2023
Efficacy of Cryotherapy and Hangeshashinto for Radiation-induced Oral Stomatitis: Preliminary Study.
PMID:36881064
2023this review onlyChemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (grade 2 or higher by CTCAE v5.0, described as more than grade 1)not extracted yet
Matsuda 2015
Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II study of TJ-14 (Hangeshashinto) for infusional fluorinated-pyrimidine-based…
DOI:10.1007/s00280-015-2767-y
2015this review onlyChemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (grade 2 or higher by CTCAE v5.0, described as more than grade 1)not extracted yet
Matsuda 2015
Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II study of TJ-14 (Hangeshashinto) for infusional fluorinated-pyrimidine-based…
PMID:25983022
2015this review onlyChemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (grade 2 or higher by CTCAE v5.0, described as more than grade 1)not extracted yet
Moriyama 2018
Impact of the use of Kampo medicine in patients with esophageal cancer during chemotherapy:a clinical trial for oral hygiene and oral…
DOI:10.2152/jmi.65.184
2018this review onlyChemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (grade 2 or higher by CTCAE v5.0, described as more than grade 1)not extracted yet
Moriyama 2018
Impact of the use of Kampo medicine in patients with esophageal cancer during chemotherapy:a clinical trial for oral hygiene and oral…
PMID:30282858
2018this review onlyChemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (grade 2 or higher by CTCAE v5.0, described as more than grade 1)not extracted yet
Taira 2020
The effect of Hangeshashinto on Oral Mucositis Caused by Induction Chemotherapy in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.
PMID:32884437
2020this review onlyChemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (grade 2 or higher by CTCAE v5.0, described as more than grade 1)not extracted yet
Takahashi 2018
Prevention of the Chemotherapy-Induced Oral Mucositis in Esophageal Cancer by Use of Hangeshashinto (TJ-14)
DOI:10.9738/intsurg-d-17-00114.1
2018this review onlyChemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (grade 2 or higher by CTCAE v5.0, described as more than grade 1)not extracted yet

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPatients receiving chemotherapyPatients with gastric, colorectal, esophageal, or head and neck cancer receiving chemotherapy in Japan (n=293)
InterventionHangeshashintoHangeshashinto 2.5 g x 3/day (one study 0.625 g x 3/day) as oral rinse and swallow, sorbet or frozen; 2 to 8 weeks (n=141)
ComparisonWithout hangeshashinto or placeboPlacebo (3 studies) or no hangeshashinto (3 studies) (n=152)
OutcomesIncidence of oral mucositis (grade 2 or higher)Oral mucositis incidence (CTCAE grade 2 or higher)
Study designsRandomized or case-matched studies; English5 RCTs and 1 case-matched study
TimingNot specifiedStudies published 2014 to 2023

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalNoNoyes
3Choice of study designs explainedYesYesyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalNoNoyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNoNoyes
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesPartial Yesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: YesNRSI: Yes · RCT: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: NoNRSI: No · RCT: Yesno
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalYesYesyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowCritically Lowyes