Non-Cochrane · systematic review · PM42234020

Comparative efficacy of electric toothbrush technologies in plaque and gingivitis reduction: a network meta-analysis.

Luo Chenchen, Chen Nanyu, Jing Qiuyu, et al. · Clinical oral investigations · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1007/s00784-026-06955-z

Findings

33 findings

Population
Children and adults with permanent or mixed dentitionOscillating-rotating electric toothbrushManual toothbrushPlaque reduction (RMNPI, scale 0 to 1)
longest follow-up per study
MD -0.18 [-0.24, -0.12]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Children and adults with permanent or mixed dentitionOscillating-rotating electric toothbrushManual toothbrushGingivitis reduction (gingival index)
single brushing episode, outcome immediately after brushing · Short-term single-use stratum
SMD -1.21 [-1.62, -0.8]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Children and adults with permanent or mixed dentitionOscillating-rotating electric toothbrushManual toothbrushPlaque reduction (plaque index)
single brushing episode, outcome immediately after brushing · Short-term single-use stratum
SMD -1.52 [-1.98, -1.06]
GRADE not reported
7 studies
Children and adults with permanent or mixed dentitionOscillating-rotating electric toothbrushManual toothbrushGingivitis reduction (gingival index)
intervention period of at least 1 week · Longer-term home-use stratum (>=1 week)
SMD -0.84 [-1.18, -0.5]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Children and adults with permanent or mixed dentitionOscillating-rotating electric toothbrushManual toothbrushGingivitis reduction (MGI, scale 0 to 4)
longest follow-up per study
MD -0.32 [-0.45, -0.19]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Children and adults with permanent or mixed dentitionOscillating-rotating electric toothbrushManual toothbrushPlaque reduction (plaque index)
longest follow-up per study
SMD -1.24 [-1.56, -0.92]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Children and adults with permanent or mixed dentitionOscillating-rotating electric toothbrushManual toothbrushPlaque reduction (plaque index)
intervention period of at least 1 week · Longer-term home-use stratum (>=1 week)
SMD -0.96 [-1.35, -0.57]
GRADE not reported
12 studies
Children and adults with permanent or mixed dentitionSonic electric toothbrushManual toothbrushGingivitis reduction (gingival index)
single brushing episode, outcome immediately after brushing · Short-term single-use stratum
SMD -0.89 [-1.28, -0.5]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Children and adults with permanent or mixed dentitionSonic electric toothbrushManual toothbrushPlaque reduction (plaque index)
intervention period of at least 1 week · Longer-term home-use stratum (>=1 week)
SMD -0.71 [-1.08, -0.34]
GRADE not reported
12 studies
Children and adults with permanent or mixed dentitionSonic electric toothbrushManual toothbrushGingivitis reduction (gingival index)
intervention period of at least 1 week · Longer-term home-use stratum (>=1 week)
SMD -0.62 [-0.94, -0.3]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Children and adults with permanent or mixed dentitionSonic electric toothbrushManual toothbrushPlaque reduction (plaque index)
single brushing episode, outcome immediately after brushing · Short-term single-use stratum
SMD -1.1 [-1.52, -0.68]
GRADE not reported
7 studies
Children and adults with permanent or mixed dentitionSonic electric toothbrushManual toothbrushPlaque reduction (plaque index)
longest follow-up per study
SMD -0.87 [-1.15, -0.59]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Children and adults with permanent or mixed dentitionUltrasonic electric toothbrushManual toothbrushPlaque reduction (plaque index)
single brushing episode, outcome immediately after brushing · Short-term single-use stratum
SMD -0.68 [-1.12, -0.24]
GRADE not reported
7 studies
Children and adults with permanent or mixed dentitionUltrasonic electric toothbrushManual toothbrushGingivitis reduction (gingival index)
single brushing episode, outcome immediately after brushing · Short-term single-use stratum
SMD -0.54 [-0.96, -0.12]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Children and adults with permanent or mixed dentitionUltrasonic electric toothbrushManual toothbrushPlaque reduction (plaque index)
intervention period of at least 1 week · Longer-term home-use stratum (>=1 week)
SMD -0.43 [-0.82, -0.04]
GRADE not reported
12 studies
Children and adults with permanent or mixed dentitionUltrasonic electric toothbrushManual toothbrushGingivitis reduction (gingival index)
intervention period of at least 1 week · Longer-term home-use stratum (>=1 week)
SMD -0.35 [-0.71, 0.01]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Children and adults with permanent or mixed dentitionOther electric toothbrushManual toothbrushPlaque reduction (plaque index)
intervention period of at least 1 week · Longer-term home-use stratum (>=1 week)
SMD -0.31 [-0.74, 0.12]
GRADE not reported
12 studies
Children and adults with permanent or mixed dentitionOther electric toothbrushManual toothbrushGingivitis reduction (gingival index)
single brushing episode, outcome immediately after brushing · Short-term single-use stratum
SMD -0.38 [-0.83, 0.07]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Children and adults with permanent or mixed dentitionOther electric toothbrushManual toothbrushPlaque reduction (plaque index)
single brushing episode, outcome immediately after brushing · Short-term single-use stratum
SMD -0.52 [-0.98, -0.06]
GRADE not reported
7 studies
Children and adults with permanent or mixed dentitionOther electric toothbrushManual toothbrushGingivitis reduction (gingival index)
intervention period of at least 1 week · Longer-term home-use stratum (>=1 week)
SMD -0.25 [-0.65, 0.15]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Children and adults with permanent or mixed dentitionElectric toothbrush (any type)Manual toothbrushGingivitis reduction (gingival index)SMD 0.82 [0.65, 0.98]
GRADE not reported
19 studies · 1250 participants
Short-term (<=1 month)Electric toothbrush (any type)Manual toothbrushPlaque reduction (plaque index)
Short-term (<=1 month) · Short-term (<=1 month)
SMD 0.88 [0.7, 1.06]
GRADE not reported
8 studies · 500 participants
Elderly (>65 years)Electric toothbrush (any type)Manual toothbrushGingivitis reduction (gingival index)
Elderly (>65 years)
SMD 1.18 [0.58, 1.51]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 170 participants
Children (3-12 years)Electric toothbrush (any type)Manual toothbrushPlaque reduction (plaque index)
Children (3-12 years)
SMD 1.05 [0.78, 1.32]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 200 participants
Children (<12 years)Electric toothbrush (any type)Manual toothbrushGingivitis reduction (gingival index)
Children (<12 years)
SMD 1.05 [0.78, 1.32]
GRADE not reported
5 studies · 250 participants
Adolescents (12-17 years)Electric toothbrush (any type)Manual toothbrushGingivitis reduction (gingival index)
Adolescents (12-17 years)
SMD 0.75 [0.6, 0.96]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 180 participants
Children and adults with permanent or mixed dentitionElectric toothbrush (any type)Manual toothbrushPlaque reduction (plaque index)SMD 0.82 [0.65, 0.99]
GRADE not reported
19 studies · 1250 participants
Non-orthodontic patientsElectric toothbrush (any type)Manual toothbrushPlaque reduction (plaque index)
Non-orthodontic patients
SMD 0.68 [0.5, 0.86]
GRADE not reported
16 studies · 1100 participants
Long-term (>1 month)Electric toothbrush (any type)Manual toothbrushPlaque reduction (plaque index)
Long-term (>1 month) · Long-term (>1 month)
SMD 0.78 [0.61, 0.95]
GRADE not reported
11 studies · 750 participants
Orthodontic patientsElectric toothbrush (any type)Manual toothbrushPlaque reduction (plaque index)
Orthodontic patients
SMD 1.18 [0.85, 1.51]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 150 participants
Adults (18-65 years)Electric toothbrush (any type)Manual toothbrushPlaque reduction (plaque index)
Adults (18-65 years)
SMD 0.75 [0.6, 0.9]
GRADE not reported
12 studies · 850 participants
Elderly (>=65 years)Electric toothbrush (any type)Manual toothbrushPlaque reduction (plaque index)
Elderly (>=65 years)
SMD 0.32 [-0.05, 0.69]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 100 participants
Adults (18-65 years)Electric toothbrush (any type)Manual toothbrushGingivitis reduction (gingival index)
Adults (18-65 years)
SMD 0.23 [-0.06, 0.68]
GRADE not reported
8 studies · 650 participants

Included primary studies 35

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Costa 2007
Efficacy of ultrasonic, electric and manual toothbrushes in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances.
PMID:17319775
20071 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Adam 2020
Evaluation of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush with micro-vibrations versus a sonic toothbrush for the reduction of plaque and…
DOI:10.1111/idj.12569
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Adam 2020
Evaluation of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush with micro-vibrations versus a sonic toothbrush for the reduction of plaque and…
PMID:32243576
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Allocca 2018
Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial
DOI:10.1186/s40729-018-0150-6
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Allocca 2018
Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial.
PMID:30536124
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ccahuana-Vasquez 2017
A 5-week randomized clinical evaluation of a novel electric toothbrush head with regular and tapered bristles versus a manual toothbrush…
PMID:30375187
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ccahuana-Vasquez 2019
A 5‐week randomized clinical evaluation of a novel electric toothbrush head with regular and tapered bristles versus a manual toothbrush…
DOI:10.1111/idh.12372
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Costa 2007
Efficacy of Ultrasonic, Electric and Manual Toothbrushes in Patients with Fixed Orthodontic Appliances
DOI:10.2319/0003-3219(2007)077[0361:eoueam]2.0.co;2
2007this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Danser 2000
A laboratory and clinical investigation comparing 2 oscillating/rotating electric toothbrushes
DOI:10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027004277.x
2000this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Danser 2000
A laboratory and clinical investigation comparing 2 oscillating/rotating electric toothbrushes.
PMID:10783843
2000this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Danser 2003
Plaque removal with a novel manual toothbrush (X‐Active) and the Braun Oral‐B 3D Plaque Remover
DOI:10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00114.x
2003this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Danser 2003
Plaque removal with a novel manual toothbrush (X-Active) and the Braun Oral-B 3D Plaque Remover.
PMID:12622856
2003this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Davidovich 2021
Randomised clinical study of plaque removal efficacy of an electric toothbrush in primary and mixed dentition
DOI:10.1111/ipd.12753
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Davidovich 2021
Randomised clinical study of plaque removal efficacy of an electric toothbrush in primary and mixed dentition.
PMID:33225464
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Davidovich 2024
A 4‐week randomized controlled trial evaluating plaque and gingivitis effects of an electric toothbrush in a paediatric population
DOI:10.1111/ipd.13130
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Davidovich 2024
A 4-week randomized controlled trial evaluating plaque and gingivitis effects of an electric toothbrush in a paediatric population.
PMID:37864381
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Dorfer 2001
A clinical study to compare the efficacy of 2 electric toothbrushes in plaque removal
DOI:10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.281101.x
2001this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Dörfer 2001
A clinical study to compare the efficacy of 2 electric toothbrushes in plaque removal.
PMID:11686818
2001this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Erbe 2019
A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the plaque removal efficacy of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush versus a sonic toothbrush in…
DOI:10.2319/080317-520.1
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Erbe 2019
A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the plaque removal efficacy of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush versus a sonic toothbrush in…
PMID:30516414
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Fjeld 2017
A 1-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial with focus on manual and electric toothbrushes’ effect on dental hygiene in nursing homes
DOI:10.1080/00016357.2017.1416166
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Fjeld 2017
A 1-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial with focus on manual and electric toothbrushes' effect on dental hygiene in nursing homes.
PMID:29239260
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Grender 2020
An 8-week randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of a novel oscillating-rotating toothbrush versus a manual toothbrush on plaque…
DOI:10.1111/idj.12571
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Grender 2020
An 8-week randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of a novel oscillating-rotating toothbrush versus a manual toothbrush on plaque…
PMID:32243573
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Khan 2022
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Manual Toothbrush Versus Power Toothbrush in Reduction of Gingivitis: A Comparative Clinical Study.
PMID:36110608
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lazarescu 2003
Efficacy of plaque removal and learning effect of a powered and a manual toothbrush
DOI:10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00361.x
2003this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lazarescu 2003
Efficacy of plaque removal and learning effect of a powered and a manual toothbrush.
PMID:12887341
2003this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mareddy 2024
Comparative Evaluation of Plaque Removal Potential of Manual Electrical and Chewable Toothbrushes in Children: A Clinical Trial.
PMID:39867114
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Nobre 2020
Assessment of the efficacy of the utilisation of conventional and electric toothbrushes by the older adults
DOI:10.1111/j.1741-2358.2012.00635.x
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Nobre 2020
Assessment of the efficacy of the utilisation of conventional and electric toothbrushes by the older adults.
PMID:25039577
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Pulayath 2024
Efficacy of Oral Hygiene Aids in Gingivitis Management: A Comparative Study of Manual and Electric Toothbrushes, Dental Floss, and…
PMID:39926908
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Van der Weijden 1996
Comparison of an oscillating/rotating electric toothbrush and a ‘sonic’ toothbrush in plaque‐removing ability
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-051x.1996.tb00565.x
1996this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Van der Weijden 1996
Comparison of an oscillating/rotating electric toothbrush and a 'sonic' toothbrush in plaque-removing ability. A professional…
PMID:8739175
1996this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zimmer 2002
Clinical efficacy of a new sonic/ultrasonic toothbrush
DOI:10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.290604.x
2002this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zimmer 2002
Clinical efficacy of a new sonic/ultrasonic toothbrush.
PMID:12296775
2002this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationChildren or adults with permanent or mixed dentitionHealthy adults, children, elderly, orthodontic patients, implant patients (n=19 RCTs, 23 to 150 participants each)
InterventionElectric toothbrush (oscillating-rotating, sonic, ultrasonic, other electric)Oscillating-rotating, sonic, ultrasonic and other electric toothbrushes (n=19 RCTs)
ComparisonManual toothbrush (electric versus electric head-to-head trials also eligible)Manual toothbrush and head-to-head electric comparators
OutcomesChange in a validated plaque index and/or gingivitis indexPlaque index and gingivitis index (SMD)
Study designsRandomized controlled trials (parallel-group and crossover)RCTs (parallel, crossover, split-mouth; n=19)
TimingLongest follow-up per study; stratified by single-use versus at least 1 week home useSingle-use (n=7) to 12 months